Hofmann Sabine, Kornmann Marko, Henne-Bruns Doris, Formentini Andrea
Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Ulm, Germany.
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2012 Jan 9;1:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/iprs000002. eCollection 2012.
Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries are rare, but potentially life-threatening due to herniation of abdominal organs into the pleural cavities. They can be easily overlooked on initial diagnostics and a high index of suspicion is required. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the clinical presentation, diagnostic methods and surgical management of patients with diaphragmatic rupture at our institution.
A retrospective study was performed to analyze our experience with patients suffering from traumatic diaphragmatic rupture. Charts were reviewed for sex, age, side-location, concomitant injuries, time-to-diagnosis, diagnostic methods, surgical approach and outcome.
Fourteen patients (median age: 46 yrs, range 18-71, 9 male, 5 female) with diaphragmatic injuries (left side: 10, right side: 4) were treated between July 2003 and September 2011. Mechanism of injury was a penetrating trauma (14%), blunt trauma (50%) and others (36%). Associated abdominal injuries included spleen rupture (n=3), liver laceration (n=2), abdominal wall laceration (n=2) and gastric perforation (n=1). Computed tomography was the most sensitive diagnostic method. All patients underwent trans-abdominal repair of the diaphragmatic defect (direct suture: 10, prosthetic mesh insertion: 4). Associated abdominal procedures included splenectomy (n=3), liver packing (n=2), abdominal wall reconstruction (n=2) and partial gastric resection (n=1). Morbidity and hospital mortality rate were 36% and 0%, respectively. Median postoperative hospital stay was 17 days (range: 7-40 days).
Morbidity and mortality of diaphragmatic ruptures are mainly determined by associated injuries or complications of diaphragmatic herniation like incarceration of viscera or lung failure. Early diagnosis helps to prevent severe complications. Spiral CT-scan is the most reliable tool for acute diagnosis of diaphragmatic rupture and associated visceral lacerations. Laparotomy is an adequate surgical approach for diaphragmatic repair, especially in cases of associated abdominal organ injury.
创伤性膈肌损伤较为罕见,但由于腹腔脏器疝入胸腔可危及生命。在初始诊断时它们很容易被忽视,因此需要高度的怀疑指数。这项回顾性研究的目的是分析我院膈肌破裂患者的临床表现、诊断方法及手术治疗情况。
进行一项回顾性研究,分析我们治疗创伤性膈肌破裂患者的经验。查阅病历以了解患者的性别、年龄、损伤部位、合并伤、确诊时间、诊断方法、手术方式及预后。
2003年7月至2011年9月期间,共治疗了14例膈肌损伤患者(中位年龄:46岁,范围18 - 71岁,男性9例,女性5例),损伤部位为左侧10例,右侧4例。损伤机制包括穿透伤(14%)、钝性伤(50%)及其他(36%)。合并的腹部损伤包括脾破裂(n = 3)、肝裂伤(n = 2)、腹壁裂伤(n = 2)及胃穿孔(n = 1)。计算机断层扫描是最敏感的诊断方法。所有患者均接受经腹膈肌缺损修补术(直接缝合:10例,置入人工补片:4例)。相关的腹部手术包括脾切除术(n = 3)、肝填塞术(n = 2)、腹壁重建术(n = 2)及部分胃切除术(n = 1)。发病率和医院死亡率分别为36%和0%。术后中位住院时间为17天(范围:7 - 40天)。
膈肌破裂的发病率和死亡率主要取决于合并伤或膈肌疝的并发症,如脏器嵌顿或肺功能衰竭。早期诊断有助于预防严重并发症。螺旋CT扫描是急性诊断膈肌破裂及相关内脏裂伤最可靠的工具。剖腹手术是膈肌修补的合适手术方式,尤其是在合并腹部脏器损伤的情况下。