Suppr超能文献

不同树脂水门汀类型和膜厚度对黏结到牙釉质或牙本质的二硅酸锂陶瓷的抗折性能的影响。

Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses.

机构信息

Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry International Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;26(2):141-149. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12372. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of cement film thickness, cement type, and substrate (enamel or dentin) on ceramic fracture resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred extracted human third molars were polished to obtain 50 enamel and 50 dentin specimens. The specimens were cemented to 1-mm-thick lithium disilicate ceramic plates with different cement film thicknesses (100 and 300 μm) using metal strips as spacers. The cements used were etch-and-rinse (RelyX Ultimate) and self-adhesive (RelyX U200) resin cements. Compressive load was applied on the ceramic plates using a universal testing machine, and fracture loads were recorded in Newtons (N). Statistical analysis was performed by multiple regression (p < 0.05). Representative specimens were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy to control the cement film thickness.

RESULTS

The RelyX Ultimate group with a cement thickness of 100 μm cemented to enamel showed the highest mean fracture load (MFL; 1591 ± 172.59 N). The RelyX Ultimate groups MFLs were significantly higher than the corresponding RelyX U200 groups (p < 0.05), and thinner film cement demonstrated a higher MFL than thicker films (p < 0.05). Bonding to dentin resulted in lower MFL than with enamel (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher fracture loads were related to thinner cement film thickness and RelyX Ultimate resin cement. Bonding to dentin resulted in lower fracture loads than bonding to enamel.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Reduced resin film thickness could reduce lithium disilicate restoration fracture. Etch-and-rinse resin cements are recommended for cementing on either enamel or dentin, compared with self-adhesive resin cement, for improved fracture resistance.

摘要

目的

研究水泥膜厚度、水泥类型和基底(牙釉质或牙本质)对陶瓷抗裂性能的影响。

材料和方法

从 100 颗人第三磨牙中提取并抛光,获得 50 个牙釉质和 50 个牙本质样本。使用金属条作为间隔物,将样本用不同的水泥膜厚度(100 和 300μm)粘接到 1mm 厚的二硅酸锂陶瓷板上。使用的水泥为酸蚀-冲洗(RelyX Ultimate)和自粘接(RelyX U200)树脂水泥。使用万能试验机对陶瓷板施加压缩载荷,并以牛顿(N)记录断裂载荷。通过多元回归进行统计分析(p<0.05)。使用扫描电子显微镜评估代表性样本,以控制水泥膜厚度。

结果

在牙釉质上用 100μm 厚的 RelyX Ultimate 水泥粘结的组显示出最高的平均断裂载荷(MFL;1591±172.59N)。RelyX Ultimate 组的 MFL 显著高于相应的 RelyX U200 组(p<0.05),较薄的水泥膜粘结显示出更高的 MFL,而较厚的水泥膜粘结则显示出较低的 MFL(p<0.05)。与牙釉质粘结相比,与牙本质粘结导致更低的 MFL(p<0.001)。

结论

更高的断裂载荷与更薄的水泥膜厚度和 RelyX Ultimate 树脂水泥有关。与牙釉质粘结相比,与牙本质粘结导致更低的断裂载荷。

临床意义

减少树脂膜厚度可以降低二硅酸锂修复体的断裂。与自粘接树脂水泥相比,酸蚀-冲洗树脂水泥推荐用于牙釉质或牙本质的粘结,以提高抗裂性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验