Lowe J K, Boyer C N, Griffith A P, Waller J C, Bates G E, Keyser P D, Larson J A, Holcomb E
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jan;99(1):634-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9475. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
Heifer rearing is one of the largest production expenses for dairy cattle operations, which is one reason milking operations outsource heifer rearing to custom developers. The cost of harvested feedstuffs is a major expense in heifer rearing. A possible way to lower feed costs is to graze dairy heifers, but little research exists on this topic in the mid-south United States. The objectives of this research were to determine the cost of feeding bred dairy heifers grazing native warm-season grasses (NWSG), with and without legumes, and compare the cost of grazing with the cost of rearing heifers using 3 traditional rations. The 3 rations were corn silage with soybean meal, corn silage with dry distillers grain, and a wet distillers grain-based ration. Bred Holstein heifers between 15- and 20-mo-old continuously grazed switchgrass (SG), SG with red clover (SG+RC), a big bluestem and Indiangrass mixture (BBIG), and BBIG with red clover (BBIG+RC) in Tennessee during the summer months. Total grazing days were calculated for each NWSG to determine the average cost/animal per grazing day. The average daily gain (ADG) was calculated for each NWSG to develop 3 harvested feed rations that would result in the same ADG over the same number of grazing day as each NWSG treatment. The average cost/animal per grazing day was lowest for SG ($0.48/animal/grazing d) and highest for BBIG+RC ($1.10/animal/grazing d). For both BBIG and SG, legumes increased the average cost/animal per grazing day because grazing days did not increase enough to account for the additional cost of the legumes. No difference was observed in ADG for heifers grazing BBIG (0.85 kg/d) and BBIG+RC (0.94 kg/d), and no difference was observed in ADG for heifers grazing SG (0.71 kg/d) and SG+RC (0.70 kg/d). However, the ADG for heifers grazing SG and SG+RC was lower than the ADG for heifers grazing either BBIG or BBIG+RC. The average cost/animal per grazing day was lower for all NWSG treatments than the average cost/animal per day for all comparable feed rations at a low, average, and high yardage fee. Results of this study suggest that SG was the most cost-effective NWSG alternative to harvested feeds for bred dairy heifer rearing.
培育小母牛是奶牛养殖中最大的生产开支之一,这也是挤奶作业将小母牛培育外包给定制养殖者的原因之一。收获饲料的成本是小母牛培育中的一项主要开支。降低饲料成本的一种可能方法是让小母牛放牧,但在美国中南部关于这个主题的研究很少。本研究的目的是确定喂养怀有身孕的放牧本地暖季型草(NWSG)的小母牛的成本,包括有无豆科植物的情况,并将放牧成本与使用三种传统日粮培育小母牛的成本进行比较。这三种日粮分别是玉米青贮与豆粕、玉米青贮与干酒糟以及以湿酒糟为基础的日粮。15至20月龄怀有身孕的荷斯坦小母牛在夏季的几个月里持续放牧田纳西州的柳枝稷(SG)、柳枝稷与红三叶草(SG+RC)、大须芒草和印第安草混合物(BBIG)以及大须芒草和印第安草混合物与红三叶草(BBIG+RC)。计算每种NWSG的总放牧天数,以确定每头动物每天的平均成本。计算每种NWSG的平均日增重(ADG),以制定三种收获饲料日粮,使其在与每种NWSG处理相同的放牧天数内产生相同的ADG。SG的每头动物每天的平均成本最低(0.48美元/动物/放牧日),BBIG+RC的最高(1.10美元/动物/放牧日)。对于BBIG和SG,豆科植物都增加了每头动物每天的平均成本,因为放牧天数增加得不够多,无法抵消豆科植物的额外成本。放牧BBIG(0.85千克/天)和BBIG+RC(0.94千克/天)的小母牛的ADG没有差异,放牧SG(0.71千克/天)和SG+RC(0.70千克/天)的小母牛的ADG也没有差异。然而,放牧SG和SG+RC的小母牛的ADG低于放牧BBIG或BBIG+RC的小母牛的ADG。在低、中、高场地费情况下,所有NWSG处理的每头动物每天的平均成本都低于所有可比饲料日粮的每头动物每天的平均成本。本研究结果表明,对于怀有身孕奶牛小母牛的培育,SG是收获饲料中最具成本效益的NWSG替代方案。