Hawkins Anna, Burdine K H, Amaral-Phillips D M, Costa Joao H C
Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 16;7:625. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00625. eCollection 2020.
Replacement heifer rearing is critical for the future of dairy operations, to improve genetic merit and maintain herd size. A myriad of options exist on how to manage, feed, and ultimately raise replacement heifers. Pasture is perceived to offer optimal welfare and an economical housing system for replacement animals, but confinement systems are gaining popularity. This study investigates the costs associated with replacement heifer management decisions from birth to calving, considering the factors of housing systems, labor, feed, and health. The objective of this study was to develop an economic model to determine the cost of raising a replacement heifer managed in confinement, dry-lot, and pasture-based scenarios post-weaning. We accounted for variation in feed, labor, and health inputs and quantified the impact of these individual management decisions. An economic simulation with 10,000 iterations were completed for each situation using @Risk and PrecisionTree add-ons (Palisade Corporation, Ithaca, NY) where health incidence, commodity prices, and management variables were made stochastic. Published literature or sample farm data created parameters used in Pert distributions. Costs and biological responses were reflective of published surveys, literature, and market conditions. Management decision inputs had 3 main factors: housing type, ration composition, and labor utilization. Housing systems were calculated separately for confinement, dry-lot, and pasture scenarios. The mean total cost (min, max) to raise a replacement heifer from birth to calving, assuming the same pre-weaning strategy of group housing with an automatic calf feeder, was found to be $1,919.02 ($1,777.25, $2,100.57), $1,593.57 ($1,490.30, $1,737.26), and $1,335.84 ($1,266.69, $1,423.94) for confinement, dry-lot, and pasture, respectively. Total housing cost per replacement heifer was $423.05, $117.96, and $207.96 for confinement, dry-lot, and pasture management systems, respectively. When compared to total cost, housing contributed 21% for confinement, 7% for dry-lot, and 15% for pasture. Upon analysis of all scenarios, utilizing pasture to raise heifers resulted in a lower overall cost when compared to confinement housing options. Percentage breakdowns of feed, labor, housing, and fixed and variable costs provided more information on efficiency rather than total cost, which makes each situation different in relation to on-farm cost. This cost analysis is critical to assisting farms in making decisions in the utilization of their resources for replacement dairy heifers.
后备小母牛的饲养对于奶牛场的未来至关重要,有助于提高遗传品质并维持牛群规模。在如何管理、喂养以及最终饲养后备小母牛方面,存在无数种选择。人们认为牧场能为后备牲畜提供最佳福利和经济的饲养系统,但圈养系统也越来越受欢迎。本研究调查了从出生到产犊期间与后备小母牛管理决策相关的成本,考虑了饲养系统、劳动力、饲料和健康等因素。本研究的目的是建立一个经济模型,以确定在断奶后采用圈养、干栏式和牧场式饲养方式下饲养一头后备小母牛的成本。我们考虑了饲料、劳动力和健康投入的差异,并量化了这些个体管理决策的影响。使用@Risk和PrecisionTree插件(纽约州伊萨卡市的Palisade公司)对每种情况进行了10000次迭代的经济模拟,其中健康发病率、商品价格和管理变量是随机的。已发表的文献或样本农场数据创建了用于PERT分布的参数。成本和生物学反应反映了已发表的调查、文献和市场情况。管理决策输入有3个主要因素:饲养类型、日粮组成和劳动力利用。分别计算了圈养、干栏式和牧场式饲养场景的饲养系统成本。假设断奶前采用与自动犊牛饲养器一起进行群体饲养的相同策略,从出生到产犊饲养一头后备小母牛的平均总成本(最小值、最大值)分别为圈养1919.02美元(1777.25美元、2100.57美元)、干栏式1593.57美元(1490.30美元、1737.26美元)和牧场式1335.84美元(1266.69美元、1423.94美元)。圈养、干栏式和牧场式饲养管理系统下,每头后备小母牛的饲养总成本分别为423.05美元、117.96美元和207.96美元。与总成本相比,饲养成本在圈养中占21%,在干栏式中占7%,在牧场式中占15%。在对所有场景进行分析后发现,与圈养方式相比,利用牧场饲养小母牛总体成本更低。饲料、劳动力、饲养以及固定和可变成本的百分比细分提供了更多关于效率而非总成本的信息,这使得每种情况在农场成本方面有所不同。这种成本分析对于帮助农场在利用资源饲养后备奶牛小母牛方面做出决策至关重要。