Suppr超能文献

主动-被动预防和抗病毒预防在妊娠期间预防围生期乙型肝炎病毒感染的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of active-passive prophylaxis and antiviral prophylaxis during pregnancy to prevent perinatal hepatitis B virus infection.

机构信息

National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2016 May;63(5):1471-80. doi: 10.1002/hep.28310. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In an era of antiviral treatment, reexamination of the cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent perinatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission in the United States is needed. We used a decision tree and Markov model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the current U.S. strategy and two alternatives: (1) Universal hepatitis B vaccination (HepB) strategy: No pregnant women are screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). All infants receive HepB before hospital discharge; no infants receive hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG). (2) Current strategy: All pregnant women are screened for HBsAg. Infants of HBsAg-positive women receive HepB and HBIG ≤12 hours of birth. All other infants receive HepB before hospital discharge. (3) Antiviral prophylaxis strategy: All pregnant women are screened for HBsAg. HBsAg-positive women have HBV-DNA load measured. Antiviral prophylaxis is offered for 4 months starting in the third trimester to women with DNA load ≥10(6) copies/mL. HepB and HBIG are administered at birth to infants of HBsAg-positive women, and HepB is administered before hospital discharge to infants of HBsAg-negative women. Effects were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Compared to the universal HepB strategy, the current strategy prevented 1,006 chronic HBV infections and saved 13,600 QALYs (ICER: $6,957/QALY saved). Antiviral prophylaxis dominated the current strategy, preventing an additional 489 chronic infections, and saving 800 QALYs and $2.8 million. The results remained robust over a wide range of assumptions.

CONCLUSION

The current U.S. strategy for preventing perinatal HBV remains cost-effective compared to the universal HepB strategy. An antiviral prophylaxis strategy was cost saving compared to the current strategy and should be considered to continue to decrease the burden of perinatal hepatitis B in the United States.

摘要

目的

在抗病毒治疗时代,需要重新评估美国预防围生期乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)传播的策略的成本效益。我们使用决策树和马尔可夫模型来评估当前美国策略和两种替代方案的成本效益:(1)普遍乙型肝炎疫苗(HepB)接种策略:不筛查孕妇乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)。所有婴儿在出院前均接受 HepB;不给予婴儿乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白(HBIG)。(2)当前策略:所有孕妇筛查 HBsAg。HBsAg 阳性孕妇的婴儿在出生后 12 小时内接受 HepB 和 HBIG。所有其他婴儿在出院前接受 HepB。(3)抗病毒预防策略:所有孕妇筛查 HBsAg。HBsAg 阳性孕妇检测 HBV-DNA 载量。对于 HBV-DNA 载量≥10⁶拷贝/ml 的孕妇,从妊娠晚期开始提供 4 个月的抗病毒预防。HBsAg 阳性孕妇的婴儿出生时给予 HepB 和 HBIG,HBsAg 阴性孕妇的婴儿在出院前给予 HepB。通过质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)来衡量效果。与普遍 HepB 策略相比,当前策略预防了 1006 例慢性 HBV 感染,节省了 13600QALY(ICER:每节省 1 个 QALY 的成本为 6957 美元)。抗病毒预防策略优于当前策略,可额外预防 489 例慢性感染,节省 800QALY 和 280 万美元。在广泛的假设范围内,结果仍然稳健。

结论

与普遍 HepB 策略相比,美国目前预防围生期 HBV 的策略仍然具有成本效益。与当前策略相比,抗病毒预防策略具有成本效益,应考虑继续降低美国围生期乙型肝炎的负担。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验