McIvor Arthur
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Am J Ind Med. 2015 Nov;58 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S23-30. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22509.
This paper investigates silicosis as a disabling disease in underground mining in the United Kingdom (UK) before Second World War, exploring the important connections between South Africa and the UK and examining some of the issues raised at the 1930 International Labour Office Conference on silicosis in Johannesburg in a British context. The evidence suggests there were significant paradoxes and much contestation in medical knowledge creation, advocacy, and policy-making relating to this occupational disease. It is argued here that whilst there was an international exchange of scientific knowledge on silicosis in the early decades of the twentieth century, it was insufficient to challenge the traditional defense adopted by the British government of proven beyond all scientific doubt before effective intervention in coal mining. This circumspect approach reflected dominant business interests and despite relatively robust trade union campaigning and eventual reform, the outcome was an accumulative legacy of respiratory disease and disability that blighted coalfield communities.
本文研究了第二次世界大战前英国地下采矿中作为致残性疾病的矽肺病,探讨了南非与英国之间的重要联系,并在英国背景下审视了1930年在约翰内斯堡举行的国际劳工组织矽肺病会议上提出的一些问题。证据表明,在与这种职业病相关的医学知识创造、宣传和政策制定方面存在重大矛盾和诸多争议。本文认为,虽然在20世纪的头几十年里存在关于矽肺病的国际科学知识交流,但这不足以挑战英国政府在有效干预煤矿开采之前采用的“在所有科学怀疑之外得到证实”的传统辩护。这种谨慎的做法反映了占主导地位的商业利益,尽管工会进行了相对有力的斗争并最终实现了改革,但结果却是呼吸系统疾病和残疾的累积遗留问题,给煤田社区带来了困扰。