Bloor M
School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Soc Stud Sci. 2000 Feb;30(1):125-40. doi: 10.1177/030631200030001005.
Oral history materials from the South Wales Miners' Library are used to examine the communal understandings of, collective responses to, the scourge of Miners' Lung (pneumoconiosis) in the 1920s and 1930s. Lay epidemiology in mining communities attributed an aetiological role to coaldust at a time when many experts believed miners' pulmonary disease to be bronchitic, or to be silica-induced. In their efforts to secure compensation claims for their members, union officials instrumentally used scientific expertise in a variety of forms: they contributed to epidemiological evidence; they lobbied for more government-funded research; they 'bought' experts; they duped expert witnesses; and they made sophisticated instrumental appeals to the supposed independence of favorable expert judgements. Eventually, miners' situated' 'local knowledge' became scientific orthodoxy, a success story which may be associated with the class-conscious miners' 'bump of irreverence' about expert knowledge, and with the divided character of the expert core-set, sections of which were receptive to miners' 'local knowledge' claims.
来自南威尔士矿工图书馆的口述历史资料被用于研究20世纪20年代和30年代矿工社区对矿工肺(尘肺病)这一灾祸的集体认知以及集体应对措施。在许多专家认为矿工的肺部疾病是支气管炎或由二氧化硅引起的时候,矿区社区的外行流行病学将病因归咎于煤尘。工会官员在为其成员争取赔偿要求的过程中,以各种形式巧妙地利用了科学专业知识:他们为流行病学证据做出贡献;游说政府提供更多资金用于研究;“收买”专家;欺骗专家证人;并巧妙地利用有利的专家判断的所谓独立性进行有策略的呼吁。最终,矿工的“地方性”“本地知识”成为了科学正统观念,这一成功案例可能与有阶级意识的矿工对专家知识的“不敬之感”以及专家核心群体的分裂特征有关,其中一部分人接受了矿工的“本地知识”主张。