Suppr超能文献

过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ激动剂用于预防中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的复发性中风和其他血管事件。

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists for preventing recurrent stroke and other vascular events in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

作者信息

Liu Jia, Wang Lu-Ning

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Changchun Street 45, Beijing, China, 100053.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29(10):CD010693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010693.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) agonists are insulin-sensitising drugs used for the treatment of insulin resistance. In addition to lowering glucose in diabetes, these drugs may also protect against hyperlipidaemia and arteriosclerosis, which are risk factors for stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of PPAR-γ agonists in the secondary prevention of stroke and related vascular events for people with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (July 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 6), MEDLINE (1949 to July 2015), EMBASE (1980 to July 2015), CINAHL (1982 to July 2015), AMED (1985 to July 2015) and 11 Chinese databases (July 2015). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials we searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies. We did not impose any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PPAR-γ agonists versus placebo for the secondary prevention of stroke and related vascular events in people with stroke or TIA, with the outcomes of recurrent stroke, vascular events and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted eligible data, cross-checked the data for accuracy, and assessed methodological quality and risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified four eligible studies with 1163 participants; only one study had a low risk of bias for all domains. Three studies evaluated the drug pioglitazone and one study evaluated rosiglitazone. The participants in different studies were heterogeneous. The number of participants with recurrent stroke was evaluated in two studies, where PPAR-γ agonists reduced the recurrence of stroke compared with placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 0.80). PPAR-γ agonists given over a mean duration of 34.5 months in a single trial were found to reduce a composite outcome of total events of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.99). Data on additional composite outcomes reflecting serious adverse events (all-cause death and other major vascular events; all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke) were similar although the confidence intervals were wider and the effects were not statistically significant. In addition, two studies respectively measured insulin sensitivity and the ubiquitin-proteasome activity in carotid plaques. These results were significantly improved by PPAR-γ agonists in comparison with placebo. None of the studies reported the number of participants with disability due to vascular events or improvement in quality of life. Three RCTs reported information about adverse events. Frequent adverse events included oedema, cardiac failure and anaemia. Evidence that adverse events occurred more frequently in participants treated with PPAR-γ agonists when compared with placebo was imprecise and inconsistent (risk difference (RD) 10%, 95% CI -8% to 28%, I² = 86%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PPAR-γ agonists appear to reduce recurrent stroke and total events of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke, and improve insulin sensitivity and the stabilisation of carotid plaques. There is evidence of limited quality that they are well tolerated. However, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution considering the small number and the quality of the included studies. In future, well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to assess the efficacy and safety of PPAR-γ agonists in the secondary prevention of stroke and related vascular events in people with stroke or TIA.

摘要

背景

过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPAR-γ)激动剂是用于治疗胰岛素抵抗的胰岛素增敏药物。除降低糖尿病患者的血糖外,这些药物还可能预防高脂血症和动脉硬化,而高脂血症和动脉硬化是中风的危险因素。

目的

评估PPAR-γ激动剂对中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者预防中风及相关血管事件的疗效和安全性。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane中风组试验注册库(2015年7月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL 2015年第6期)、MEDLINE(1949年至2015年7月)、EMBASE(1980年至2015年7月)、CINAHL(1982年至2015年7月)、AMED(1985年至2015年7月)以及11个中文数据库(2015年7月)。为了识别更多已发表、未发表及正在进行的试验,我们检索了正在进行的试验注册库、参考文献列表及相关会议论文集,并联系了作者和制药公司。我们未设任何语言限制。

选择标准

我们纳入了评估PPAR-γ激动剂与安慰剂用于中风或TIA患者预防中风及相关血管事件的随机对照试验(RCT),其结局指标为复发性中风、血管事件及不良事件。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立筛选所识别记录的标题和摘要,选择纳入研究,提取合格数据,交叉核对数据准确性,并评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。

主要结果

我们识别出4项合格研究,共1163名参与者;只有1项研究在所有领域的偏倚风险较低。3项研究评估了药物吡格列酮,1项研究评估了罗格列酮。不同研究中的参与者具有异质性。两项研究评估了复发性中风的参与者数量,与安慰剂相比,PPAR-γ激动剂降低了中风复发率(风险比(RR)0.52,95%置信区间(CI)0.34至0.80)。在一项试验中,平均治疗34.5个月的PPAR-γ激动剂被发现可降低心血管死亡、非致命性心肌梗死或非致命性中风的总事件复合结局(RR 0.73,95%CI 0.54至0.99)。反映严重不良事件(全因死亡和其他主要血管事件;全因死亡率、非致命性心肌梗死或非致命性中风)的其他复合结局数据相似,尽管置信区间更宽且效果无统计学意义。此外,两项研究分别测量了胰岛素敏感性和颈动脉斑块中的泛素-蛋白酶体活性。与安慰剂相比,PPAR-γ激动剂使这些结果得到显著改善。没有研究报告因血管事件导致残疾的参与者数量或生活质量的改善情况。3项RCT报告了不良事件信息。常见不良事件包括水肿、心力衰竭和贫血。与安慰剂相比,PPAR-γ激动剂治疗的参与者不良事件发生频率更高的证据不精确且不一致(风险差(RD)10%,95%CI -8%至28%,I² = 86%)。

作者结论

PPAR-γ激动剂似乎可降低复发性中风以及心血管死亡、非致命性心肌梗死或非致命性中风的总事件,并改善胰岛素敏感性和颈动脉斑块的稳定性。有质量有限的证据表明它们耐受性良好。然而考虑到纳入研究的数量和质量,这些结论应谨慎解读。未来,需要设计良好、大样本的双盲RCT来评估PPAR-γ激动剂对中风或TIA患者预防中风及相关血管事件的确切疗效和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验