• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎高强度区解读中的可靠性与变异性。

Reliability and variability in the interpretation of lumbar high intensity zone.

作者信息

Fan Shun-Wu, Fang Xiang-Qian, Liu Yun-Jian, Yu He-Jun, Lu Yin-Jiang, Liu Chao

机构信息

Zhejiang University Faculty of Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Province, China.

Wenzhou Medical College, Lishui Central Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(6):606-13. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0267.

DOI:10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0267
PMID:26511686
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of high intensity zone (HIZ) and to assess discrepancy in the interpretation, as well as investigate the effects of parameters of HIZ on interobserver variation.

METHODS

Four spine surgeons made independent observations on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 207 consecutive patients from 3 institutions. The κ statistic was used to characterize inter- and intraobserver reliability for visual assessments of HIZ. The corresponding MRI was provided to 2 additional spine surgeons for quantitative measurements. The parameters of HIZ, including signal intensity (SI) and area ratio (HIZ%), were used to assess the interobserver variation of HIZ.

RESULTS

The overall interobserver agreement for visual assessments was substantial (κ=0.62 at L4-5 and 0.61 at L5-S1), and intraobserver agreement was excellent (κ=0.84 at L4-5 and 0.86 at L5-S1). Of 93 observed HIZ, 17 instances (18.3%) were agreed upon by all visual observers. The SI with full agreement was significantly brighter than all the others (p<0.01). The HIZ% with 2 agreements was significantly smaller than those with 4 agreements (p=0.04) and 3 agreements (p=0.03). Although fewer observers with consensus were associated with smaller HIZ%, the difference was not significant (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The reliability in the interpretation of HIZ was sufficient for spine surgeons with differing levels of experience. This study highlighted that signal intensity was the primary cause of variability in visual observation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估高强度区(HIZ)的可靠性,评估其解读差异,并研究HIZ参数对观察者间差异的影响。

方法

四位脊柱外科医生对来自3家机构的207例连续患者的腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)进行独立观察。κ统计量用于描述观察者间和观察者内对HIZ视觉评估的可靠性。相应的MRI提供给另外两位脊柱外科医生进行定量测量。HIZ的参数,包括信号强度(SI)和面积比(HIZ%),用于评估HIZ的观察者间差异。

结果

视觉评估的总体观察者间一致性较高(L4 - 5节段κ = 0.62,L5 - S1节段κ = 0.61),观察者内一致性极佳(L4 - 5节段κ = 0.84,L5 - S1节段κ = 0.86)。在观察到的93个HIZ中,所有视觉观察者对17例(18.3%)达成了一致。完全一致的SI明显比其他所有情况更亮(p < 0.01)。有两项一致意见的HIZ%明显小于有四项一致意见的(p = 0.04)和有三项一致意见的(p = 0.03)。尽管达成共识的观察者越少,HIZ%越小,但差异不显著(p > 0.05)。

结论

对于经验水平不同的脊柱外科医生,HIZ解读的可靠性是足够的。本研究强调信号强度是视觉观察中变异性的主要原因。

相似文献

1
Reliability and variability in the interpretation of lumbar high intensity zone.腰椎高强度区解读中的可靠性与变异性。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(6):606-13. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0267.
2
Quantitative estimation of the high-intensity zone in the lumbar spine: comparison between the symptomatic and asymptomatic population.腰椎高强度区域的定量评估:有症状人群与无症状人群的比较。
Spine J. 2014 Mar 1;14(3):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.078. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
3
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings.腰椎:磁共振成像结果的可靠性
Radiology. 2009 Jan;250(1):161-70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493071999. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
4
Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source.腰椎间盘高强度区:激发性椎间盘造影术在确定盘源性疼痛来源中的价值及意义
Eur Spine J. 2000 Feb;9(1):36-41. doi: 10.1007/s005860050006.
5
Correlation of low back pain to a high-intensity zone of the lumbar disc in Indian patients.印度患者下背痛与腰椎间盘高强度区的相关性
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009 Aug;17(2):190-3. doi: 10.1177/230949900901700214.
6
Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.腰椎间盘假体候选者 MRI 检查结果的可靠性。
Neuroradiology. 2012 Jul;54(7):699-707. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
7
The pathogenesis and clinical significance of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) of lumbar intervertebral disc on MR imaging in the patient with discogenic low back pain.腰椎间盘源性下腰痛患者磁共振成像中椎间盘高强度区(HIZ)的发病机制及临床意义
Eur Spine J. 2006 May;15(5):583-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0892-8. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
8
Interobserver reliability of detecting lumbar intervertebral disc high-intensity zone on magnetic resonance imaging and association of high-intensity zone with pain and anular disruption.磁共振成像检测腰椎间盘高强度区的观察者间可靠性以及高强度区与疼痛和纤维环破裂的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Oct 1;23(19):2074-80. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199810010-00007.
9
The correlation between the lumbar disc MRI high-intensity zone and discogenic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腰椎间盘 MRI 高信号区与椎间盘源性下腰痛的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 7;18(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04187-5.
10
Classification of High Intensity Zones of the Lumbar Spine and Their Association with Other Spinal MRI Phenotypes: The Wakayama Spine Study.腰椎高强度区域的分类及其与其他脊柱MRI表型的关联:和歌山脊柱研究
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 20;11(9):e0160111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160111. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence and spine imaging: limitations, regulatory issues and future direction.人工智能与脊柱影像学:局限性、监管问题及未来方向。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Aug;31(8):2007-2021. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07108-4. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
2
High-Intensity Zones on MRI of the Cervical Spine in Patients: Epidemiology and Association With Pain and Disability.患者颈椎MRI上的高强度区域:流行病学及其与疼痛和残疾的关联
Global Spine J. 2022 Jun;12(5):829-839. doi: 10.1177/2192568220966328. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
3
[Changes in shape and signal intensity of high intensity zone in lumbar intervertebral discs on magnetic resonance images: a longitudinal study].
腰椎间盘磁共振图像上高强度区域的形态和信号强度变化:一项纵向研究
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Aug 30;38(9):1135-1138. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.09.19.