Suppr超能文献

复杂穿透性主动脉溃疡的胸主动脉腔内修复术:一项11年单中心经验

Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Complicated Penetrating Aortic Ulcer: An 11-Year Single-Center Experience.

作者信息

Jánosi Rolf Alexander, Gorla Riccardo, Tsagakis Konstantinos, Kahlert Philipp, Horacek Michael, Bruckschen Florian, Dohle Daniel-Sebastian, Jakob Heinz, Schlosser Thomas, Eggebrecht Holger, Bossone Eduardo, Erbel Raimund

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen and University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

Department of Cardiology, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen and University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Feb;23(1):150-9. doi: 10.1177/1526602815613790. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze an 11-year single-center experience of treating complicated penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

This study included 63 consecutive patients (mean age 69.1±11.5 years; 40 men) with complicated PAU (42 symptomatic, 22 with rupture) who underwent TEVAR between 2002 and 2013. The PAUs were located in the aortic arch (n=11), the descending thoracic aorta (n=43), and the thoracoabdominal aorta (n=9).

RESULTS

TEVAR was performed within 14 days of diagnosis in 33 (52.3%) cases (19 ruptures treated immediately); the other 30 (47.6%) patients had an average interval between diagnosis and intervention of 40±39 days. Technical success was 98.4% (62/63). One patient had a type I endoleak after stent-graft repair of a PAU in the aortic arch without great vessel transposition; another procedure was required for carotid-subclavian bypass and proximal stent-graft extension. No patient experienced spinal cord ischemia after TEVAR. Five (7.9%) patients died in-hospital; 3 had severe cardiac complications, 1 died from complications of aortic rupture, and the other succumbed to septic shock. Mean follow-up was 45.6±47.2 months, during which 12 (19.0%) patients needed a secondary intervention because of late endoleaks (n=4, 6.3%) or new complications due to disease progression. Multivariate analysis indicated that a PAU depth >15 mm was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 6.92, p=0.03). In the biomarker analysis, symptomatic patients had significantly higher D-dimer and troponin levels compared to asymptomatic patients [559.5±460.7 vs 283.2±85.2 µg/L (p=0.016) and 0.22±0.61 vs 0.02±0.03 ng/mL (p=0.04), respectively].

CONCLUSION

Patients with PAU suffer from underlying severe atherosclerotic disease and have a significant number of cardiovascular comorbidities that lead to relevant mortality and morbidity after TEVAR. As a PAU diameter >15 mm represented high risk for disease progression, these patients may be candidates for early intervention. D-dimer levels may help identify patients at risk and with progression of PAU.

摘要

目的

分析在单一中心11年中使用胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)治疗复杂性穿透性主动脉溃疡(PAU)的经验。

方法

本研究纳入了2002年至2013年间连续63例接受TEVAR治疗的复杂性PAU患者(平均年龄69.1±11.5岁;40例男性)(42例有症状,22例发生破裂)。PAU位于主动脉弓(n = 11)、胸降主动脉(n = 43)和胸腹主动脉(n = 9)。

结果

33例(52.3%)患者在诊断后14天内接受了TEVAR治疗(19例破裂患者立即接受治疗);其他30例(47.6%)患者诊断与干预之间的平均间隔为40±39天。技术成功率为98.4%(62/63)。1例主动脉弓PAU患者在未进行大血管转位的支架移植物修复后出现I型内漏;需要进行颈动脉-锁骨下动脉旁路移植术和近端支架移植物延伸术。TEVAR术后无患者发生脊髓缺血。5例(7.9%)患者在住院期间死亡;3例有严重心脏并发症,1例死于主动脉破裂并发症,另1例死于感染性休克。平均随访时间为45.6±47.2个月,在此期间,12例(19.0%)患者因晚期内漏(n = 4,6.3%)或疾病进展导致的新并发症需要二次干预。多因素分析表明,PAU深度>15 mm是死亡率的独立预测因素(风险比6.92,p = 0.03)。在生物标志物分析中,有症状患者的D-二聚体和肌钙蛋白水平显著高于无症状患者[分别为559.5±460.7 vs 283.2±85.2 μg/L(p = 0.016)和0.22±0.61 vs 0.02±0.03 ng/mL(p = 0.04)]。

结论

PAU患者患有潜在的严重动脉粥样硬化疾病,并有大量心血管合并症,导致TEVAR术后有显著的死亡率和发病率。由于PAU直径>15 mm代表疾病进展的高风险,这些患者可能是早期干预的候选者。D-二聚体水平可能有助于识别有PAU风险和疾病进展的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验