Suppr超能文献

测试姿势稳定性:星形偏移平衡测试与Biodex平衡系统稳定性极限测试是否一致?

Testing Postural Stability: Are the Star Excursion Balance Test and Biodex Balance System Limits of Stability Tests Consistent?

作者信息

Glave A Page, Didier Jennifer J, Weatherwax Jacqueline, Browning Sarah J, Fiaud Vanessa

机构信息

Sam Houston State University, 801 Bowers Blvd., Suite 249A Hunstville, TX 77340, USA.

West Texas A & M University, Department of Sports and Exercise Sciences, WTAMU Box 60216, Canyon, TX 79016, USA.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2016 Jan;43:225-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.09.028. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

Abstract

There are a variety of options to test postural stability; however many physical tests lack validity information. Two tests of postural stability - the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) and Biodex Balance System Limits of Stability Test (LOS) - were examined to determine if similar components of balance were measured. Healthy adults (n=31) completed the LOS (levels 6 and 12) and SEBT (both legs). SEBT directions were offset by 180° to approximate LOS direction. Correlations and partial correlations controlling for height were analyzed. Correlations were significant for SEBT 45° and LOS back-left (6: r=-0.41; 12: r=-0.42; p<0.05), SEBT 90° and LOS 6 left (r=-0.51, p<0.05), SEBT 135(o) and LOS 6 front-left (r=-0.53, p<0.05), SEBT overall and LOS 6 overall (r=-0.43, p<0.05). Partial correlations were significant for SEBT 90° and LOS 6 left (rSEBT,LOS·H=-0.45, p<0.05) and SEBT 135° and LOS 6 front-left (rSEBT,LOS·H=-0.51, p<0.05), and SEBT overall and LOS 6 overall (rSEBT,LOS·H=-0.37, p<0.05). These findings indicate the tests seem to assess different components of balance. Research is needed to determine and define what specific components of balance are being assessed. Care must be taken when choosing balance tests to best match the test to the purpose of testing (fall risk, athletic performance, etc.).

摘要

有多种测试姿势稳定性的方法;然而,许多体格检查缺乏有效性信息。对两种姿势稳定性测试——星形偏移平衡测试(SEBT)和Biodex平衡系统稳定性极限测试(LOS)——进行了检验,以确定是否测量了相似的平衡成分。健康成年人(n = 31)完成了LOS(6级和12级)和SEBT(双腿)测试。SEBT的方向偏移180°以接近LOS方向。分析了控制身高后的相关性和偏相关性。SEBT 45°与LOS左后方(6级:r = -0.41;12级:r = -0.42;p < 0.05)、SEBT 90°与LOS 6级左侧(r = -0.51,p < 0.05)、SEBT 135°与LOS 6级左前方(r = -0.53,p < 0.05)、SEBT总体与LOS 6级总体(r = -0.43,p < 0.05)的相关性显著。SEBT 90°与LOS 6级左侧(rSEBT,LOS·H = -0.45,p < 0.05)、SEBT 135°与LOS 6级左前方(rSEBT,LOS·H = -0.51,p < 0.05)以及SEBT总体与LOS 6级总体(rSEBT,LOS·H = -0.37,p < 0.05)的偏相关性显著。这些发现表明,这两种测试似乎评估的是不同的平衡成分。需要开展研究以确定并定义所评估的平衡的具体成分。选择平衡测试时必须谨慎,以便使测试与测试目的(跌倒风险、运动表现等)最佳匹配。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验