Goodby Emmeline, MacLeod Andrew K
Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2016 Jun;55(2):93-106. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12096. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
This study employed the Future Thinking Task (MacLeod et al., 2005, Br. J. Clin. Psychol., 44, 495) to investigate whether future-directed thinking in first-episode psychosis is significantly different from that of matched controls, and to identify its correlates in this patient group.
Cross-sectional, mixed-model, case-control design.
Participants were 30 patients with first-episode psychosis and 27 matched controls. The Future Thinking Task was used to assess future-directed thinking in both groups. Anxiety and depression were also measured as well as self-report measures of hopelessness, suicide ideation and a measure of negative symptoms.
Individuals with psychosis were impaired in future-directed thinking in both positive and negative domains, particularly with respect to the coming year. Increased self-reported hopelessness was associated with reduced positive future thinking and increased negative future thinking. Increased positive future thinking was also associated with reduced severity of negative symptoms, whilst negative future thinking was associated with suicide ideation.
Individuals with first-episode psychosis show a reduction in positive future thinking in line with that seen in other clinical groups, but this is accompanied by an unexpected reduction in negative future thinking. The findings suggest a general disengagement with the future in this group that may affect recovery and functioning.
Individuals with first-episode psychosis may benefit from interventions to help them engage with their future, in particular in the mid-range, up to 1 year. The Future Thinking Task may be a helpful addition to the assessment of suicide risk in those with first-episode psychosis. Decreased positive future thinking was associated with increased severity of negative symptoms, indicating a potential new treatment angle for this resistant aspect of psychosis. The cross-sectional design of this study does not allow for conclusions about the causal relationship between psychosis and future-directed thinking. This study investigated future-directed thinking in individuals with a range of psychotic illnesses employing a trans-diagnostic approach; therefore, conclusions cannot be drawn about the nature of future-directed thinking in individual psychotic disorders.
本研究采用未来思维任务(MacLeod等人,2005年,《英国临床心理学杂志》,44卷,495页)来调查首发精神病患者的前瞻性思维是否与匹配的对照组有显著差异,并确定该患者群体中前瞻性思维的相关因素。
横断面、混合模型、病例对照设计。
参与者为30例首发精神病患者和27名匹配的对照组。使用未来思维任务评估两组的前瞻性思维。还测量了焦虑和抑郁以及绝望、自杀意念的自我报告量表和阴性症状量表。
精神病患者在积极和消极领域的前瞻性思维均受损,尤其是在未来一年方面。自我报告的绝望感增加与积极的未来思维减少和消极的未来思维增加有关。积极的未来思维增加也与阴性症状严重程度降低有关,而消极的未来思维与自杀意念有关。
首发精神病患者的积极未来思维减少,这与其他临床群体的情况一致,但同时消极的未来思维也意外减少。研究结果表明该群体普遍对未来缺乏参与,这可能会影响康复和功能。
首发精神病患者可能会从帮助他们与未来建立联系的干预措施中受益,特别是在中期,即长达1年的时间范围内。未来思维任务可能有助于评估首发精神病患者的自杀风险。积极的未来思维减少与阴性症状严重程度增加有关,这表明针对精神病这一难治方面可能有一个新的治疗角度。本研究的横断面设计无法得出关于精神病与前瞻性思维之间因果关系的结论。本研究采用跨诊断方法调查了一系列精神病性疾病患者的前瞻性思维;因此,无法得出关于个体精神病性障碍中前瞻性思维本质的结论。