• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠作为卵母细胞采集麻醉剂的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Propofol versus thiopental sodium as anaesthetic agents for oocyte retrieval: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Goutziomitrou Evangelia, Venetis Christos A, Kolibianakis Efstratios M, Bosdou Julia K, Parlapani Aggeliki, Grimbizis Gregoris, Tarlatzis Basil C

机构信息

Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Women's and Children's Health, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Dec;31(6):752-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.08.013
PMID:26515147
Abstract

Clinical outcomes of IVF cycles using propofol or thiopental sodium as anaesthetic agents for oocyte retrieval were compared. The primary outcome measure was fertilization rate per patient. One hundred and eighty patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for IVF were randomized to receive either propofol (n = 90) or thiopental sodium (n = 90). No significant differences in baseline characteristics were present between the two groups. Overall fertilization rates were similar between propofol and thiopental sodium groups, respectively: median (IQR): 54.8 (29.2) versus 54.6 (29.7); fertilization rates for intracytoplasmic sperm injection only: median (IQR): 70 (50) versus 75 (50), respectively. For secondary outcome measures, time under anaesthesia was significantly increased in the thiopental sodium group: median (IQR): 12(5) versus 10 (4.5) min, P = 0.019 compared with the propofol group. Number of cumulus oocyte complexes retrieved [median (IQR): 7.1 (6.3) versus 6.5 (5.6)] did not differ significantly between the two groups. A non-significant difference in live birth rates per randomized patient of +4.4% (95% CI: -5.7 to +14.6) in favour of propofol was observed. Use of propofol compared with thiopental sodium for general anaesthesia during oocyte retrieval results in similar fertilization rates and IVF outcomes.

摘要

比较了使用丙泊酚或硫喷妥钠作为麻醉剂进行卵母细胞采集的体外受精周期的临床结局。主要结局指标是每位患者的受精率。180例接受促性腺激素和促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂卵巢刺激以进行体外受精的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受丙泊酚(n = 90)或硫喷妥钠(n = 90)。两组之间的基线特征无显著差异。丙泊酚组和硫喷妥钠组的总体受精率相似,分别为:中位数(四分位间距):54.8(29.2)对54.6(29.7);仅卵胞浆内单精子注射的受精率分别为:中位数(四分位间距):70(50)对75(50)。对于次要结局指标,硫喷妥钠组的麻醉时间显著延长:中位数(四分位间距):12(5)分钟对10(4.5)分钟,与丙泊酚组相比,P = 0.019。两组间回收的卵丘卵母细胞复合体数量[中位数(四分位间距):7.1(6.3)对6.5(5.6)]无显著差异。观察到随机分组患者中有利于丙泊酚的活产率有+4.4%的非显著差异(95%CI:-5.7至+14.6)。在卵母细胞采集期间使用丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠进行全身麻醉,受精率和体外受精结局相似。

相似文献

1
Propofol versus thiopental sodium as anaesthetic agents for oocyte retrieval: a randomized controlled trial.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠作为卵母细胞采集麻醉剂的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Dec;31(6):752-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
2
Is the time interval between HCG administration and oocyte retrieval associated with oocyte retrieval rate?注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)与取卵之间的时间间隔是否与取卵率相关?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Nov;31(5):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
3
Effects of induction anesthetic agents on outcome of assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of propofol and thiopental sodium.诱导麻醉剂对辅助生殖技术结局的影响:丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠的比较
Chang Gung Med J. 2000 Sep;23(9):513-9.
4
General anesthesia with propofol during oocyte retrieval and in vitro fertilization outcomes: retrospective cohort study.在卵母细胞采集和体外受精过程中使用异丙酚进行全身麻醉的效果:回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 17;13(1):8021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35224-2.
5
Corifollitropin alfa compared with follitropin beta in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized controlled trial.Corifollitropin alfa 与 follitropin beta 在接受 ICSI 的反应不良者中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):432-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu301. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
6
Comparison of in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in extremely low oocyte retrieval cycles.体外受精与卵胞浆内单精子注射在极低取卵周期中的比较。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jan;93(1):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.039. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
7
Analgesia with remifentanil versus anesthesia with propofol-alfentanil for transvaginal oocyte retrieval: a randomized trial on their impact on in vitro fertilization outcome.瑞芬太尼镇痛与丙泊酚-阿芬太尼麻醉用于经阴道取卵的比较:关于其对体外受精结局影响的随机试验
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jun;21(5):685-92.
8
Comparison of different anaesthetic methodologies for sedation during in vitro fertilization procedures: effects on patient physiology and oocyte competence.比较不同的麻醉方法在体外受精过程中的镇静作用:对患者生理和卵子能力的影响。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012 Oct;28(10):796-9. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2012.664193. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
9
In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in single- versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in normally responding patients: a randomized trial.在正常反应患者中单双腔取卵针在体外受精-胞浆内单精子注射结局的随机试验。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):812-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.013.
10
The effect of anesthetic agents for oocyte pick-up on in vitro fertilization outcome: A retrospective study in a tertiary center.取卵术中麻醉药物对体外受精结局的影响:一项在三级中心的回顾性研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;58(5):673-679. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.07.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects and safety of propofol intravenous anesthesia in transvaginal oocyte retrieval on outcomes of fertilization and embryo transplantation.丙泊酚静脉麻醉在经阴道取卵术中对受精及胚胎移植结局的影响与安全性
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 16;15:1497948. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1497948. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of Preoperative Anxiety on Depth of Anaesthesia and In Vitro Fertilization Success.术前焦虑对麻醉深度及体外受精成功率的影响
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2023 Oct 24;51(5):414-419. doi: 10.4274/TJAR.2023.22829.
3
Pain Management during Ultrasound Guided Transvaginal Oocyte Retrieval - A Narrative Review.
超声引导下经阴道取卵术的疼痛管理——一项叙述性综述
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2023 Jan-Mar;16(1):2-15. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_141_22.