Suppr超能文献

电压标测对指导持续性心房颤动患者是否进行后壁消融的影响。

Impact of Voltage Mapping to Guide Whether to Perform Ablation of the Posterior Wall in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

作者信息

Cutler Michael J, Johnson Jeremy, Abozguia Khalid, Rowan Shane, Lewis William, Costantini Otto, Natale Andrea, Ziv Ohad

机构信息

Heart and Vascular Center, MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Jan;27(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/jce.12830. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fibrosis as a substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown in numerous preclinical models. Voltage mapping enables in vivo assessment of scar in the left atrium (LA), which can be targeted with catheter ablation.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that using the presence or absence of low voltage to guide ablation beyond pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) will improve atrial arrhythmia (AF/AT)-free survival in persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Single-center retrospective analysis of 2 AF ablation strategies: (1) standard ablation (SA) versus (2) voltage-guided ablation (VGA). PVAI was performed in both groups. With SA, additional lesions beyond PVAI were performed at the discretion of the operator. With VGA, additional lesions to isolate the LA posterior wall were performed if voltage mapping of this region in sinus rhythm showed scar (LA voltage < 0.5 mV). AF-/AT-free endpoint was defined as no sustained AF/AT seen off antiarrhythmic medications after a 2-month postablation blanking period. Seventy-six patients underwent SA and 65 underwent VGA. Patients were well matched for comorbidities, LVEF, and left atrial size. Posterior wall ablation was performed in 57% of patient with SA compared to 42% with VGA. VGA ablation increased 1-year AF-/AT-free survival in patients when compared to SA (80% vs. 57%; P = 0.005). In a multivariate analysis, VGA was the only independent predictor of AF-/AT-free survival (hazard ratio of 0.30; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of LA posterior wall scar may be an important ablation target in persistent AF. A prospective randomized trial is needed to confirm these data.

摘要

背景

纤维化作为心房颤动(AF)的一种基质已在众多临床前模型中得到证实。电压标测能够在体内评估左心房(LA)的瘢痕,而该瘢痕可用导管消融术进行靶向治疗。

目的

我们假设利用低电压的有无来指导肺静脉前庭隔离(PVAI)以外的消融治疗可提高持续性房颤患者无房性心律失常(AF/AT)的生存率。

方法与结果

对两种房颤消融策略进行单中心回顾性分析:(1)标准消融(SA)与(2)电压引导消融(VGA)。两组均进行了PVAI。SA组中,在PVAI之外的额外消融由术者自行决定。VGA组中,如果窦性心律下该区域的电压标测显示有瘢痕(LA电压<0.5 mV),则进行额外消融以隔离左心房后壁。无AF/AT终点定义为消融术后2个月空白期停用抗心律失常药物后未出现持续性AF/AT。76例患者接受了SA治疗,65例接受了VGA治疗。患者在合并症、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和左心房大小方面匹配良好。SA组57%的患者进行了后壁消融,而VGA组为42%。与SA组相比,VGA消融术提高了患者1年无AF/AT生存率(80%对57%;P = 0.005)。在多变量分析中,VGA是无AF/AT生存率的唯一独立预测因素(风险比为0.30;P = 0.002)。

结论

左心房后壁瘢痕的存在可能是持续性房颤的一个重要消融靶点。需要进行一项前瞻性随机试验来证实这些数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验