Pang Yang, Yu Tao, Xu Ye, Chen Qingxing, Ling Yunlong, Liu Guijian, Cheng Kuan, Ge Junbo, Zhu Wenqing
Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Oct 4;11(10):308. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11100308.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a foundational treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), but the effectiveness of adding posterior wall isolation (PWI) and selective complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation in the roof and anterior wall remains debated. The potential of these additional ablation techniques to improve long-term outcomes for PeAF patients is still uncertain.
This retrospective study included 151 PeAF patients who underwent first-time catheter ablation at our center. The choice of ablation strategy was based on the operator's clinical judgment, taking into account the patient's specific condition and anatomical features. Patients were divided into two groups: the PVI group, which received PVI alone, and the modified PWI (MPWI) group, which received PVI along with additional PWI and selective CFAEs ablation in the roof and anterior wall. The primary endpoint was the absence of atrial arrhythmia lasting more than 30 s, without antiarrhythmic drugs, at 12 months.
At the 12-month follow-up, 77.3% of the patients in the MPWI group and 52.1% of the patients in the PVI group remained in sinus rhythm without an atrial arrhythmia recurrence ( = 0.001). The BIC-based Cox regression analysis identified the ablation strategy and atrial fibrillation (AF) duration as independent predictors of recurrence across the cohort. It was found that MPWI significantly reduced the risk of recurrence, while a longer AF duration increased it. In the MPWI group, AF duration, left ventricular internal diameter in systole (LVIDs), and moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation were independent predictors of recurrence. In the PVI group, only the left atrial low voltage area (LVA) index was a significant predictor.
The addition of PWI and selective CFAE ablation to PVI significantly improves 12-month arrhythmia-free survival compared to PVI alone, demonstrating the superiority of this combined approach in improving long-term outcomes for patients with persistent AF.
肺静脉隔离(PVI)是持续性心房颤动(PeAF)的基础治疗方法,但在PVI基础上增加后壁隔离(PWI)以及在房顶和前壁进行选择性碎裂电位(CFAE)消融的有效性仍存在争议。这些额外消融技术改善PeAF患者长期预后的潜力仍不确定。
这项回顾性研究纳入了151例在本中心接受首次导管消融的PeAF患者。消融策略的选择基于术者的临床判断,同时考虑患者的具体情况和解剖特征。患者分为两组:单纯接受PVI的PVI组,以及接受PVI联合房顶和前壁额外PWI及选择性CFAE消融的改良PWI(MPWI)组。主要终点是在12个月时,未使用抗心律失常药物的情况下,无持续超过30秒的房性心律失常。
在12个月的随访中,MPWI组77.3%的患者和PVI组52.1%的患者维持窦性心律,无房性心律失常复发(P = 0.001)。基于BIC的Cox回归分析确定消融策略和房颤(AF)持续时间是整个队列复发的独立预测因素。发现MPWI显著降低了复发风险,而较长的AF持续时间则增加了复发风险。在MPWI组中,AF持续时间、收缩期左心室内径(LVIDs)以及中度或更严重的三尖瓣反流是复发的独立预测因素。在PVI组中,只有左心房低电压区(LVA)指数是显著的预测因素。
与单纯PVI相比,在PVI基础上增加PWI和选择性CFAE消融可显著提高12个月无心律失常生存率,表明这种联合方法在改善持续性AF患者长期预后方面具有优越性。