Rhudy James P, Bakitas Marie A, Hyrkäs Kristiina, Jablonski-Jaudon Rita A, Pryor Erica R, Wang Henry E, Alexandrov Anne W
School of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham Alabama.
Center for Nursing Research and Quality Outcomes Maine Medical Center Birmingham Alabama.
Brain Behav. 2015 Sep 23;5(10):e00398. doi: 10.1002/brb3.398. eCollection 2015 Oct.
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are ischemic emergencies. Guidelines recommend care delivery within formally regionalized systems of care at designated centers, with bypass of nearby centers of lesser or no designation. We review the evidence of the effectiveness of regionalized systems in AIS and STEMI.
Literature was searched using terms corresponding to designation of AIS and STEMI systems and from 2010 to the present. Inclusion criteria included report of an outcome on any dependent variable mentioned in the rationale for regionalization in the guidelines and an independent variable comparing care to a non- or pre-regionalized system. Designation was defined in the AIS case as certification by the Joint Commission as either a primary (PSC) or comprehensive (CSC) stroke center. In the STEMI case, the search was conducted linking "regionalization" and "myocardial infarction" or citation as a model system by any American Heart Association statement.
For AIS, 17 publications met these criteria and were selected for review. In the STEMI case, four publications met these criteria; the search was therefore expanded by relaxing the criteria to include any historical or anecdotal comparison to a pre- or nonregionalized state. The final yield was nine papers from six systems.
Although regionalized care results in enhanced process and reduced unadjusted rates of disparity in access and adverse outcomes, these differences tend to become nonsignificant when adjusted for delayed presentation and hospital arrival by means other than emergency medical services. The benefits of regionalized care occur along with a temporal trend of improvement due to uptake of quality initiatives and guideline recommendations by all systems regardless of designation. Further research is justified with a randomized registry or cluster randomized design to support or refute recommendations that regionalization should be the standard of care.
急性缺血性卒中(AIS)和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)均为缺血性急症。指南建议在指定中心的正式区域化医疗系统内提供治疗,绕过附近未指定或指定级别较低的中心。我们回顾了区域化系统在AIS和STEMI治疗中的有效性证据。
使用与AIS和STEMI系统指定相对应的术语,检索2010年至今的文献。纳入标准包括报告指南中区域化理由中提及的任何因变量的结果,以及将治疗与非区域化或预区域化系统进行比较的自变量。在AIS病例中,指定定义为获得联合委员会认证的初级(PSC)或综合(CSC)卒中中心。在STEMI病例中,搜索通过将“区域化”和“心肌梗死”联系起来进行,或者以美国心脏协会的任何声明作为模型系统进行引用。
对于AIS,17篇出版物符合这些标准并被选入综述。在STEMI病例中,4篇出版物符合这些标准;因此,通过放宽标准扩大搜索范围,以纳入与预区域化或非区域化状态的任何历史或轶事比较。最终从六个系统中得到了九篇论文。
尽管区域化医疗可改善治疗过程,降低未经调整的获得治疗机会和不良结局的差异率,但在通过紧急医疗服务以外的其他方式对延迟就诊和医院到达时间进行调整后,这些差异往往变得不显著。区域化医疗的益处伴随着所有系统(无论是否指定)采用质量改进措施和指南建议而出现的时间趋势改善。采用随机登记或整群随机设计进行进一步研究是合理的,以支持或反驳区域化应成为治疗标准的建议。