Barrett Allison C, Studnek Jonathan R, Puskarich Michael A, Jones Alan E
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(2):200-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1086844. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
Understanding the geographic distribution of critical illness within a community may provide public health stakeholders with information that can be used to expedite access to specialized care. We hypothesized that severe sepsis patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) exhibit geospatial clustering and that prehospital providers would recognize sepsis more frequently in patients transported from sepsis clusters. Retrospective review of a prospective, observational study of patients with severe sepsis transported to the emergency department (ED) by EMS and treated with early goal-directed therapy (EGDT).
suspected infection, 2 or more criteria for systemic inflammation, and either systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg after a fluid bolus or lactate >4 mmol/liter.
age <18 or need for immediate surgery. Patient location at the time of EMS activation was recorded. Analysis of the addresses identified clusters, defined as a location in which EMS transported more than one patient experiencing the above associated signs and symptoms of septic shock. Other data collected included self-reported patient location as private residence or chronic care facility. One hundred sixty severe sepsis patients transported by EMS were eligible for analysis, presenting from 125 locations. Ninety-one patients (57%) presented from a private residence and 69 (37%) from a chronic care facility. Fifty (31%) patients were transported from 15 locations, with 25 of those transported from just 4 locations. Cluster patients tended to be older, come from medical facilities, and were more likely to have sepsis recognized by prehospital providers. Results from this study demonstrate low pre-hospital recognition of sepsis, as well as geospatially clustered presentations, most notably from skilled nursing facilities. Community education, public health initiatives, and EMS interventions could be targeted in such clusters of cases in order to both improve sepsis recognition and potentially expedite time-sensitive interventions.
了解社区内危重病的地理分布情况可为公共卫生利益相关者提供信息,以加快获得专科护理的速度。我们假设,由紧急医疗服务(EMS)转运的严重脓毒症患者呈现地理空间聚集性,并且院前急救人员在从脓毒症聚集区转运的患者中更频繁地识别出脓毒症。对一项前瞻性观察性研究进行回顾,该研究对象为通过EMS转运至急诊科(ED)并接受早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)的严重脓毒症患者。
疑似感染、2项或更多全身炎症标准,以及在快速输注液体后收缩压<90 mmHg或乳酸>4 mmol/L。
年龄<18岁或需要立即手术。记录EMS启动时患者的位置。对地址进行分析以识别聚集区,聚集区定义为EMS转运了不止一名出现上述脓毒性休克相关体征和症状的患者的地点。收集的其他数据包括患者自我报告的居住地点为私人住宅或长期护理机构。160例由EMS转运的严重脓毒症患者符合分析条件,来自125个地点。91例(57%)患者来自私人住宅,69例(37%)来自长期护理机构。50例(31%)患者从15个地点转运,其中25例仅从4个地点转运。聚集区患者往往年龄较大,来自医疗机构,并且更有可能被院前急救人员识别出患有脓毒症。本研究结果表明,院前对脓毒症的识别率较低,并且存在地理空间聚集性表现,最明显的是来自专业护理机构。社区教育、公共卫生举措和EMS干预可以针对此类病例聚集区,以提高脓毒症的识别率,并可能加快对时间敏感的干预措施。