Axelsson Christer, Herlitz Johan, Karlsson Anders, Sjöberg Henrik, Jiménez-Herrera Maria, Bång Angela, Jonsson Anders, Bremer Anders, Andersson Henrik, Gellerstedt Martin, Ljungström Lars
1Faculty of Caring Science,Working Life and Social Welfare,University of Borås,The Prehospital Research Centre of Western Sweden,Borås,Sweden.
2Ambulance Service Sothern,Älvsborg Hospital,Borås,Sweden.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Jun;31(3):272-7. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000339. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
Purpose There is a lack of knowledge about the early phase of severe infection. This report describes the early chain of care in bacteraemia as follows: (a) compare patients who were and were not transported by the Emergency Medical Services (EMS); (b) describe various aspects of the EMS chain; and (c) describe factors of importance for the delay to the start of intravenous antibiotics. It was hypothesized that, for patients with suspected sepsis judged by the EMS clinician, the delay until the onset of antibiotic treatment would be shorter. Basic Procedures All patients in the Municipality of Gothenburg (Sweden) with a positive blood culture, when assessed at the Laboratory of Bacteriology in the Municipality of Gothenburg, from February 1 through April 30, 2012 took part in the survey. Main Findings/Results In all, 696 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 76 years and 52% were men. Of all patients, 308 (44%) had been in contact with the EMS and/or the emergency department (ED). Of these 308 patients, 232 (75%) were transported by the EMS and 188 (61%) had "true pathogens" in blood cultures. Patients who were transported by the EMS were older, included more men, and suffered from more severe symptoms and signs. The EMS nurse suspected sepsis in only six percent of the cases. These patients had a delay from arrival at hospital until the start of antibiotics of one hour and 19 minutes versus three hours and 21 minutes among the remaining patients (P =.0006). The corresponding figures for cases with "true pathogens" were one hour and 19 minutes versus three hours and 15 minutes (P =.009).
Among patients with bacteraemia, 75% used the EMS, and these patients were older, included more men, and suffered from more severe symptoms and signs. The EMS nurse suspected sepsis in six percent of cases. Regardless of whether or not patients with true pathogens were isolated, a suspicion of sepsis by the EMS clinician at the scene was associated with a shorter delay to the start of antibiotic treatment. Axelsson C , Herlitz J , Karlsson A , Sjöberg H , Jiménez-Herrera M , Bång A , Jonsson A , Bremer A , Andersson H , Gellerstedt M , Ljungström L . The early chain of care in patients with bacteraemia with the emphasis on the prehospital setting. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(3):272-277.
目的 对严重感染的早期阶段了解不足。本报告描述了菌血症早期的护理流程如下:(a) 比较由紧急医疗服务(EMS)转运和未转运的患者;(b) 描述EMS流程的各个方面;(c) 描述延迟开始静脉使用抗生素的重要因素。假设对于EMS临床医生判断为疑似脓毒症的患者,抗生素治疗开始的延迟时间会更短。基本程序 2012年2月1日至4月30日期间,瑞典哥德堡市所有在哥德堡市细菌学实验室评估时血培养呈阳性的患者参与了调查。主要发现/结果 共有696名患者符合纳入标准。他们的平均年龄为76岁,52%为男性。所有患者中,308名(44%)曾与EMS和/或急诊科(ED)有接触。在这308名患者中,232名(75%)由EMS转运,188名(61%)血培养中有“真正的病原体”。由EMS转运的患者年龄更大,男性更多,症状和体征更严重。EMS护士仅在6%的病例中怀疑有脓毒症。这些患者从入院到开始使用抗生素的延迟时间为1小时19分钟,而其余患者为3小时21分钟(P = 0.0006)。有“真正病原体”的病例相应数字为1小时19分钟和3小时15分钟(P = 0.009)。
在菌血症患者中,75%使用了EMS,这些患者年龄更大,男性更多,症状和体征更严重。EMS护士在6%的病例中怀疑有脓毒症。无论是否分离出真正的病原体,EMS临床医生在现场怀疑有脓毒症与抗生素治疗开始的延迟时间较短有关。阿克塞尔松C、赫利茨J、卡尔松A、舍贝里H、希门尼斯 - 埃雷拉M、邦A、琼森A、布雷默A、安德森H、盖勒施泰特M、永斯特伦L。菌血症患者早期护理流程,重点关注院前环境。《院前灾难医学》。2016;31(3):272 - 277。