Suppr超能文献

基于激励的健康干预背景下的行为改变阶段和患者激活度量表得分

Stages of change and patient activation measure scores in the context of incentive-based health interventions.

作者信息

Becker Nora V, Asch David A, Kullgren Jeffrey T, Bellamy Scarlett L, Sen Aditi P, Volpp Kevin G

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(2):133-5. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.141001-QUAN-489.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if two widely used behavioral change measures-Stages of Change (SoC) and Patient Activation Measure (PAM)-correlate with each other, are affected by financial incentives, or predict positive outcomes in the context of incentive-based health interventions.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials of incentives for weight loss and for improved diabetes self-monitoring.

SETTING

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Newark, New Jersey.

SUBJECTS

A total of 132 obese and 75 diabetic adults enrolled in one of two trials. MEASURES . SoC and PAM scores; weight loss and usage rate of diabetes self-monitoring equipment.

ANALYSIS

Multiple regression; Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

We found no association between baseline SoC and PAM scores in either study (p = .30 and p = .89). Regression models showed no association between baseline PAM score and SoC and subsequent outcomes for either study (weight loss study: PAM: p = .14, SoC: p = .1; diabetes study: PAM: p = .45, SoC: p = .61). Change in PAM score and SoC among participants in the intervention groups did not differ by study arm or among participants with better outcomes. CONCLUSION . PAM score and SoC may not effectively predict success or monitor progress among individuals enrolled in incentive-based interventions.

摘要

目的

确定两种广泛使用的行为改变测量方法——改变阶段(SoC)和患者激活度量表(PAM)——是否相互关联、是否受到经济激励的影响,或者在基于激励的健康干预背景下能否预测积极结果。

设计

对两项关于减肥激励和改善糖尿病自我监测激励的随机对照试验进行二次分析。

地点

宾夕法尼亚州费城;新泽西州纽瓦克。

研究对象

共有132名肥胖成年人和75名糖尿病成年人参与了两项试验中的一项。测量指标:SoC和PAM得分;体重减轻情况以及糖尿病自我监测设备的使用率。

分析方法

多元回归分析;克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验。

结果

在两项研究中,我们均未发现基线SoC得分与PAM得分之间存在关联(p = 0.30和p = 0.89)。回归模型显示,在两项研究中,基线PAM得分与SoC得分以及随后的结果之间均无关联(减肥研究:PAM:p = 0.14,SoC:p = 0.1;糖尿病研究:PAM:p = 0.45,SoC:p = 0.61)。干预组参与者的PAM得分和SoC得分变化在不同研究组或结果较好的参与者之间并无差异。

结论

PAM得分和SoC可能无法有效预测基于激励的干预措施参与者的成功情况或监测其进展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验