Haff Nancy, Patel Mitesh S, Lim Raymond, Zhu Jingsan, Troxel Andrea B, Asch David A, Volpp Kevin G
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):314-23. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140714-LIT-333.
To evaluate the use of behavioral economics to design financial incentives to promote health behavior change and to explore associations with demographic characteristics.
Studies performed by the Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the University of Pennsylvania published between January 2006 and March 2014.
Randomized, controlled trials with available participant-level data. Studies that did not use financial incentives to promote health behavior change were excluded.
Participant-level data from seven studies were pooled.
Meta-analysis on the pooled sample using a random-effects model with interaction terms to examine treatment effects and whether they varied by incentive structure or demographic characteristics.
The pooled study sample comprised 1403 participants, of whom 35% were female, 70% were white, 24% were black, and the mean age was 48 years (standard deviation 11.2 years). In the fully adjusted model, participants offered financial incentives had higher odds of behavior change (odds ratio [OR]: 3.96; p < .01) when compared to control. There were no significant interactions between financial incentives and gender, age, race, income, or education. When further adjusting for incentive structure, blacks had higher odds than whites of achieving behavior change (OR: 1.67; p < .05) with a conditional payment. Compared to lower-income participants, higher-income participants had lower odds of behavior change (OR: 0.46; p = .01) with a regret lottery.
Financial incentives designed using concepts from behavioral economics were effective for promoting health behavior change. There were no large and consistent relationships between the effectiveness of financial incentives and observable demographic characteristics. Second-order examinations of incentive structure suggest potential relationships among the effectiveness of financial incentives, incentive structure, and the demographic characteristics of race and income.
评估运用行为经济学设计经济激励措施以促进健康行为改变,并探讨其与人口统计学特征的关联。
宾夕法尼亚大学健康激励与行为经济学中心于2006年1月至2014年3月期间发表的研究。
具有可用参与者层面数据的随机对照试验。未使用经济激励措施促进健康行为改变的研究被排除。
汇总了七项研究的参与者层面数据。
对汇总样本进行荟萃分析,采用带有交互项的随机效应模型来检验治疗效果以及它们是否因激励结构或人口统计学特征而异。
汇总研究样本包括1403名参与者,其中35%为女性,70%为白人,24%为黑人,平均年龄为48岁(标准差11.2岁)。在完全调整模型中,与对照组相比,获得经济激励的参与者行为改变的几率更高(优势比[OR]:3.96;p <.01)。经济激励与性别、年龄、种族、收入或教育之间无显著交互作用。在进一步调整激励结构后,黑人在有条件支付情况下实现行为改变的几率高于白人(OR:1.67;p <.05)。与低收入参与者相比,高收入参与者在遗憾彩票情况下行为改变的几率更低(OR:0.46;p =.01)。
运用行为经济学概念设计的经济激励措施对促进健康行为改变有效。经济激励措施的有效性与可观察到的人口统计学特征之间没有广泛且一致的关系。对激励结构的二阶检验表明,经济激励措施的有效性、激励结构以及种族和收入的人口统计学特征之间可能存在关联。