Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, England, UK.
Owens Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jan;23(1):198-205. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5677-y. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
This study was aimed to examine the prevalence of food insecurity and what social, health, and environmental characteristics could constitute such situation in a national and population-based setting. Data was retrieved from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2006. Information on demographics, lifestyle factors, self-reported ever medical conditions in the past and self-reported food security conditions in the last 12 months calculated on the household level was obtained by household interview. Bloods and urines (subsample) were collected at the interview as well. Only adults aged 20 years and above (n = 4979) were included for statistical analysis in the present study. Chi-square test, t test, and survey-weighted logistic regression modeling were performed. Three thousand eight hundred thirty-four (77.9%) people were with full food security, 466 (9.5%) people were with marginal food security and 624 (12.7%) people were with low or very low food security. Being younger, having higher ratios of family income to poverty thresholds (due to low level of education or lack of financial support), having prior asthma, arthritis, chronic bronchitis, depression, diabetes, eczema, emphysema or liver problems, having higher levels of serum cotinine, urinary antimony, bisphenol A, pesticides, or having lower levels of urinary Benzophenone-3 were associated with food insecurity. In addition to socioeconomic and smoking conditions, evidence on people with several prior health conditions and being exposed to environmental chemicals and food insecurity is further provided. Future social, health and environmental policy, and programs protecting people from food insecurity by considering both health and environmental factors mentioned above would be suggested.
本研究旨在调查食物不安全的流行情况,以及在全国和人群基础上,哪些社会、健康和环境特征可能导致这种情况。数据来自 2005-2006 年的国家健康与营养调查。通过家庭访谈获得了家庭层面的人口统计学、生活方式因素、过去自我报告的任何疾病以及过去 12 个月自我报告的食物安全状况信息。访谈时还采集了血液和尿液(抽样)。本研究仅纳入了年龄在 20 岁及以上的成年人(n=4979)进行统计分析。采用卡方检验、t 检验和调查加权逻辑回归模型进行分析。3834 人(77.9%)具有完全食物安全,466 人(9.5%)具有边缘性食物安全,624 人(12.7%)具有低或极低食物安全。年龄较小、家庭收入与贫困线的比例较高(由于教育程度较低或缺乏经济支持)、患有哮喘、关节炎、慢性支气管炎、抑郁、糖尿病、湿疹、肺气肿或肝脏问题、血清可替宁、尿锑、双酚 A、农药水平较高,或尿苯并(e)芘-3 水平较低,与食物不安全有关。除了社会经济和吸烟状况外,本研究还提供了更多证据表明,一些患有先前健康状况的人和接触环境化学物质的人存在食物不安全问题。未来的社会、健康和环境政策和计划将建议通过考虑上述健康和环境因素来保护人们免受食物不安全的影响。