Solomon Jack, Boe Shaun, Bardouille Timothy
Laboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 1X7; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4R2.
Laboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 1X7; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4R2; School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 1X7.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;139:224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
In patients with epilepsy or space occupying tumors in cortical regions, surgical resection is often considered as the primary treatment. Pre-surgical neuroimaging can provide a detailed map of pathological and functional cortex, leading to safer surgery. Mapping can be achieved non-invasively using magnetoencephalography (MEG), and is concordant with invasive findings. However, the reliability of MEG mapping between sessions is not well established. The inter-session reliability is an important property in pre-surgical mapping to establish resection margins, but repeated scans are impracticable. The present study sought to quantify the intersession reliability of MEG localization of somatosensory cortex (S1).
Eighteen healthy individuals underwent MEG sessions on 3 consecutive days. Five participants were excluded due to technical issues during one of the three days. Each session included clinical-style S1 localization using electrical stimuli to each median nerve at sub-motor thresholds. The 35 ms peak of the somatosensory evoked field was used for localizing S1 in each session using a single equivalent current dipole model. Intersession reliability was quantified using two methods. Average Euclidean Distance (AED) quantified the difference in localization between each session and the inter-session mean localization. Session Euclidean Distance (SED) quantified the difference in localization between each pair of sessions.
Results showed the AED was 4.8 ± 1.9 mm, whereas the SED was 8.3 ± 3.4mm. While the AED values obtained parallel those reported previously in smaller samples, the SED values were substantially larger.
Clinicians should consider up to an 8mm confidence interval around the estimated location of S1 based on MEG pre-surgical mapping.
对于患有癫痫或皮质区域存在占位性肿瘤的患者,手术切除通常被视为主要治疗方法。术前神经成像可提供详细的病理和功能皮质图谱,从而实现更安全的手术。使用脑磁图(MEG)可无创地进行图谱绘制,且与侵入性检查结果一致。然而,MEG图谱在不同检查之间的可靠性尚未得到充分证实。不同检查之间的可靠性是术前图谱绘制以确定切除边缘的一项重要特性,但重复扫描并不实际可行。本研究旨在量化体感皮层(S1)的MEG定位在不同检查之间的可靠性。
18名健康个体连续3天接受MEG检查。由于在三天中的某一天出现技术问题,5名参与者被排除。每次检查都包括在亚运动阈值下对每条正中神经进行电刺激,采用临床式S1定位。体感诱发电场的35毫秒峰值用于在每次检查中使用单个等效电流偶极子模型定位S1。使用两种方法量化不同检查之间的可靠性。平均欧几里得距离(AED)量化每次检查与不同检查之间平均定位的差异。检查欧几里得距离(SED)量化每对检查之间定位的差异。
结果显示AED为4.8±1.9毫米,而SED为8.3±3.4毫米。虽然获得的AED值与先前在较小样本中报告的值相似,但SED值明显更大。
临床医生应根据MEG术前图谱绘制,在估计的S1位置周围考虑高达8毫米的置信区间。