Kreidenhuber Rudolf, De Tiège Xavier, Rampp Stefan
Department of Neurology, Christian-Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Front Neurol. 2019 Jun 13;10:628. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00628. eCollection 2019.
Preoperative localization of functionally eloquent cortex (functional cortical mapping) is common clinical practice in order to avoid or reduce postoperative morbidity. This review aims at providing a general overview of magnetoencephalography (MEG) and high-density electroencephalography (hdEEG) based methods and their clinical role as compared to common alternatives for functional cortical mapping of (1) verbal language function, (2) sensorimotor cortex, (3) memory, (4) visual, and (5) auditory cortex. We highlight strengths, weaknesses and limitations of these functional cortical mapping modalities based on findings in the recent literature. We also compare their performance relative to other non-invasive functional cortical mapping methods, such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), and to invasive methods like the intracarotid Amobarbital Test (WADA-Test) or intracranial investigations.
术前对功能明确的皮质进行定位（功能皮质图谱绘制）是常见的临床操作，目的是避免或减少术后发病率。本综述旨在全面概述基于脑磁图（MEG）和高密度脑电图（hdEEG）的方法，以及与用于（1）语言功能、（2）感觉运动皮质、（3）记忆、（4）视觉和（5）听觉皮质功能皮质图谱绘制的常见替代方法相比，它们的临床作用。我们根据近期文献中的研究结果，强调这些功能皮质图谱绘制方式的优点、缺点和局限性。我们还将它们与其他非侵入性功能皮质图谱绘制方法（如功能磁共振成像（fMRI）、经颅磁刺激（TMS））以及侵入性方法（如颈动脉内阿米妥试验（WADA试验）或颅内检查）的性能进行比较。
