Heppner G H, Miller B E
E. Walter Albachten Department of Immunology, Michigan Cancer Foundation, Detroit 48201.
Semin Oncol. 1989 Apr;16(2):91-105.
At the outset of this review, we stated that we wished to raise some questions that challenge the commonly held view that tumor heterogeneity is of major significance to treatment failure. The nature of this challenge is the following: although tumor heterogeneity in sensitivity to therapeutic agents has been demonstrated repeatedly, using isolated subpopulations of cells, primarily in cell culture systems, there is very little work that has been directed toward asking the tough questions about how that heterogeneity actually impacts on the response to treatment in vivo. In our own work, when we have attempted to simulate heterogeneity, in vivo or in vitro with mixed populations of tumor cells, we have seen that the simple prediction that treatment response would reflect the sensitivities of the individual subpopulations was not valid. Tumor subpopulation interactions, influencing both growth and drug sensitivity, resulted in treatment responses that were either better or worse than would be expected. Shifts in the distribution of subpopulations under the influence of therapy did not necessarily correlate with treatment response. Marked differences in the relative proportions of subpopulations within tumors did not necessarily translate into marked differences in the behavior of whole tumors. Imposition of in vivo-like three-dimensional tissue architecture caused major changes in the overall drug sensitivity of individual subpopulations, beyond those seen as a result of heterogeneity. Of course we realize that our work is very limited, one tumor system and a few treatment protocols, but that is the challenge. Much more in-depth experimental and clinical research is necessary in order to evaluate how, and how much, tumor heterogeneity really does affect treatment. Without such work, efforts to devise more effective treatment strategies, based on common assumptions and theoretical models, rather than experimental analysis, can only be superficial and, ultimately, useless.
在本综述开始时,我们指出希望提出一些问题,以挑战肿瘤异质性对治疗失败具有重大意义这一普遍观点。这种挑战的本质如下:尽管使用主要是细胞培养系统中的分离细胞亚群,已反复证明肿瘤对治疗药物的敏感性存在异质性,但针对肿瘤异质性如何实际影响体内治疗反应这一棘手问题开展的研究却非常少。在我们自己的研究中,当试图在体内或体外利用肿瘤细胞混合群体模拟异质性时,我们发现治疗反应会反映各个亚群敏感性的简单预测并不成立。肿瘤亚群间的相互作用,对生长和药物敏感性均有影响,导致治疗反应比预期的更好或更差。在治疗影响下亚群分布的变化不一定与治疗反应相关。肿瘤内亚群相对比例的显著差异不一定会转化为整个肿瘤行为的显著差异。施加类似体内的三维组织结构会导致各个亚群的总体药物敏感性发生重大变化,超出了因异质性而观察到的变化。当然,我们意识到我们的研究非常有限,仅涉及一个肿瘤系统和少数治疗方案,但这就是挑战所在。为了评估肿瘤异质性如何以及在多大程度上真正影响治疗,需要进行更深入的实验和临床研究。没有这样的研究,基于共同假设和理论模型而非实验分析来设计更有效治疗策略的努力只能是表面的,最终也是无用的。