• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

煤焦油污染土壤的闷烧修复:STAR 的中试现场试验。

Smoldering Remediation of Coal-Tar-Contaminated Soil: Pilot Field Tests of STAR.

机构信息

Savron , 130 Stone Road West, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 3Z2.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario , London, ON, Canada N6A 5B9.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Dec 15;49(24):14334-42. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03177. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b03177
PMID:26523324
Abstract

Self-sustaining treatment for active remediation (STAR) is an emerging, smoldering-based technology for nonaqueous-phase liquid (NAPL) remediation. This work presents the first in situ field evaluation of STAR. Pilot field tests were performed at 3.0 m (shallow test) and 7.9 m (deep test) below ground surface within distinct lithological units contaminated with coal tar at a former industrial facility. Self-sustained smoldering (i.e., after the in-well ignition heater was terminated) was demonstrated below the water table for the first time. The outward propagation of a NAPL smoldering front was mapped, and the NAPL destruction rate was quantified in real time. A total of 3700 kg of coal tar over 12 days in the shallow test and 860 kg over 11 days in the deep test was destroyed; less than 2% of total mass removed was volatilized. Self-sustaining propagation was relatively uniform radially outward in the deep test, achieving a radius of influence of 3.7 m; strong permeability contrasts and installed barriers influenced the front propagation geometry in the shallow test. Reductions in soil hydrocarbon concentrations of 99.3% and 97.3% were achieved in the shallow and deep tests, respectively. Overall, this provides the first field evaluation of STAR and demonstrates that it is effective in situ and under a variety of conditions and provides the information necessary for designing the full-scale site treatment.

摘要

自维持燃烧处理(STAR)是一种新兴的基于闷烧的非水相液体(NAPL)修复技术。本工作首次对 STAR 进行了现场评估。在一个前工业设施的不同岩性单元中,在地下水以下 3.0 m(浅层试验)和 7.9 m(深层试验)处进行了试点现场试验,该单元受到煤焦油的污染。首次在地下水位以下证明了自维持闷烧(即井内点火加热器关闭后)。绘制了 NAPL 闷烧前沿的向外扩展图,并实时量化了 NAPL 破坏率。浅层试验共处理了 12 天的 3700 千克煤焦油,深层试验处理了 11 天的 860 千克煤焦油;总去除量中只有不到 2%挥发。深层试验中,自维持传播在径向向外相对均匀,影响半径达到 3.7 m;强渗透率对比和安装的障碍物影响了浅层试验中前沿的传播几何形状。浅层和深层试验中,土壤烃浓度分别降低了 99.3%和 97.3%。总的来说,这是对 STAR 的首次现场评估,证明了它在各种条件下的原位处理是有效的,并提供了设计现场全规模处理所需的信息。

相似文献

1
Smoldering Remediation of Coal-Tar-Contaminated Soil: Pilot Field Tests of STAR.煤焦油污染土壤的闷烧修复:STAR 的中试现场试验。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Dec 15;49(24):14334-42. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03177. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
2
Self-sustaining smoldering combustion for NAPL remediation: laboratory evaluation of process sensitivity to key parameters.自维持闷烧燃烧修复地下水有机污染物:过程对关键参数敏感性的实验室评价。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Apr 1;45(7):2980-6. doi: 10.1021/es102969z. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
3
Self-sustaining smoldering combustion: a novel remediation process for non-aqueous-phase liquids in porous media.自持阴燃:一种用于多孔介质中非水相液体的新型修复工艺。
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Aug 1;43(15):5871-7. doi: 10.1021/es803483s.
4
Remediation of trichloroethylene-contaminated soils by star technology using vegetable oil smoldering.利用植物油闷烧的星级技术修复三氯乙烯污染土壤。
J Hazard Mater. 2015 Mar 21;285:346-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.042. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
5
Effectiveness of in situ air sparging for removing NAPL gasoline from a sandy aquifer near Perth, Western Australia.原位空气注入法去除西澳大利亚珀斯附近砂质含水层中NAPL汽油的有效性。
J Contam Hydrol. 2002 Nov;59(1-2):87-111. doi: 10.1016/s0169-7722(02)00077-3.
6
Comparative assessment of a foam-based oxidative treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated unsaturated and anisotropic soils.对比评估基于泡沫的氧化处理对含碳污染不饱和各向异性土壤的效果。
Chemosphere. 2019 Oct;233:667-676. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.295. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
7
Gas thermal remediation of an organic contaminated site: field trial.气体热修复有机污染场地:现场试验。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Feb;26(6):6038-6047. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-4027-2. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
8
Remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil using self-sustaining smoldering.利用自维持闷烧修复六价铬污染土壤。
Chemosphere. 2023 Sep;334:138936. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138936. Epub 2023 May 12.
9
Remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated sites by DNA diagnosis-based bioslurping technology.基于 DNA 诊断的生物吸吮技术修复石油烃污染场地。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Nov 1;497-498:250-259. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
10
Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in an aged coal tar contaminated soil under in-vessel composting conditions.在容器内堆肥条件下老化煤焦油污染土壤中多环芳烃(PAHs)的降解
Environ Pollut. 2006 Jun;141(3):459-68. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.066. Epub 2005 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Smoldering Treatment of PFAS: Investigation of Mass Balance and Volumetric Scale Up for Field Implementation.全氟和多氟烷基物质的闷烧处理:实地应用的质量平衡与体积放大研究。
ACS Omega. 2025 Jul 8;10(28):30489-30500. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c02257. eCollection 2025 Jul 22.
2
Effects of simulated low-temperature thermal remediation on the microbial community of a tropical creosote contaminated soil.模拟低温热修复对热带杂酚油污染土壤微生物群落的影响
Braz J Microbiol. 2024 Dec;55(4):3413-3424. doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01541-5. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
3
Progress of Ecological Restoration Research Based on Bibliometric Analysis.
基于文献计量分析的生态恢复研究进展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 28;20(1):520. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010520.
4
Understanding, controlling and optimising the cooling of waste thermal treatment beds including STARx Hottpads.理解、控制和优化包括 STARx Hottpads 在内的废物热处理床的冷却。
Waste Manag Res. 2022 Sep;40(9):1390-1401. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221076308. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
5
Quantification of Total Organic Carbon in Ashes from Smoldering Combustion of Sewage Sludge via a Thermal Treatment-TGA Method.通过热处理-热重分析法对污泥闷烧灰烬中总有机碳的定量分析
ACS Omega. 2020 Dec 17;5(51):33445-33454. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05426. eCollection 2020 Dec 29.