Lesourd Mathieu, Baumard Josselin, Jarry Christophe, Etcharry-Bouyx Frédérique, Belliard Serge, Moreaud Olivier, Croisile Bernard, Chauviré Valérie, Granjon Marine, Le Gall Didier, Osiurak François
Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EA 3082), Université de Lyon.
Laboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire (EA 4638), Université d'Angers.
Neuropsychology. 2016 Jul;30(5):612-23. doi: 10.1037/neu0000241. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
The goal of this study was to explore whether the tool-use disorders observed in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and semantic dementia (SD) are of the same nature as those observed in left brain-damaged (LBD) patients. Recent evidence indicates that LBD patients with apraxia of tool use encounter difficulties in solving mechanical problems, characterized by the absence of specific strategies. This pattern may show the presence of impaired mechanical knowledge, critical for both familiar and novel tool use. So, we explored the strategies followed by AD and SD patients in mechanical problem-solving tasks in order to determine whether mechanical knowledge is also impaired in these patients.
We used a mechanical problem-solving task in both choice (i.e., several tools were proposed) and no-choice (i.e., only 1 tool was proposed) conditions. We analyzed quantitative data and strategy profiles.
AD patients but not SD patients met difficulties in solving mechanical problem-solving tasks. However, the key finding is that AD patients, despite their difficulties, showed strategy profiles that are similar to that of SD patients or controls. Moreover, AD patients exhibited a strategy profile distinct from the one previously observed in LBD patients.
Those observations lead us to consider that difficulties met by AD patients to solve mechanical problems or even to use familiar tools may not be caused by mechanical knowledge impairment per se. In broad terms, what we call apraxia of tool use in AD is certainly not the same as apraxia of tool use observed in LBD patients. (PsycINFO Database Record
本研究旨在探讨阿尔茨海默病(AD)和语义性痴呆(SD)中观察到的工具使用障碍是否与左脑损伤(LBD)患者中观察到的工具使用障碍性质相同。最近的证据表明,患有工具使用失用症的LBD患者在解决机械问题时遇到困难,其特征是缺乏特定策略。这种模式可能表明存在受损的机械知识,这对熟悉和新颖的工具使用都至关重要。因此,我们探究了AD和SD患者在机械问题解决任务中所采用的策略,以确定这些患者的机械知识是否也受损。
我们在选择(即提出几种工具)和无选择(即只提出1种工具)两种条件下使用了机械问题解决任务。我们分析了定量数据和策略概况。
AD患者而非SD患者在解决机械问题解决任务时遇到困难。然而,关键发现是,AD患者尽管存在困难,但表现出与SD患者或对照组相似的策略概况。此外,AD患者表现出与先前在LBD患者中观察到的不同的策略概况。
这些观察结果使我们认为,AD患者在解决机械问题甚至使用熟悉工具时遇到的困难可能并非本身由机械知识受损所致。从广义上讲,我们所称的AD中的工具使用失用症肯定与LBD患者中观察到的工具使用失用症不同。(PsycINFO数据库记录)