Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, CRFDP, Rouen, France.
Laboratory for the Study of Cognitive Mechanisms (EA 3082), University of Lyon, France.
J Neuropsychol. 2018 Sep;12(3):409-426. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12121. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
Recent works showed that tool use can be impaired in stroke patients because of either planning or technical reasoning deficits, but these two hypotheses have not yet been compared in the field of neurodegenerative diseases. The aim of this study was to address the relationships between real tool use, mechanical problem-solving, and planning skills in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 32), semantic dementia (SD, n = 16), and corticobasal syndrome (CBS, n = 9). Patients were asked to select and use ten common tools, to solve three mechanical problems, and to complete the Tower of London test. Motor function and episodic memory were controlled using the Purdue Pegboard Test and the BEC96 questionnaire, respectively. A data-transformation method was applied to avoid ceiling effects, and single-case analysis was performed based on raw scores and completion time. All groups demonstrated either impaired or slowed tool use. Planning deficits were found only in the AD group. Mechanical problem-solving deficits were observed only in the AD and CBS groups. Performance in the Tower of London test was the best predictor of tool use skills in the AD group, suggesting these patients had general rather than mechanical problem-solving deficits. Episodic memory seemed to play little role in performance. Motor dysfunction tended to be associated with tool use skills in CBS patients, while tool use disorders are interpreted as a consequence of the semantic loss in SD in line with previous works. These findings may encourage caregivers to set up disease-centred interventions.
最近的研究表明,由于计划或技术推理缺陷,中风患者可能会出现工具使用障碍,但这两种假说尚未在神经退行性疾病领域进行比较。本研究旨在探讨阿尔茨海默病(AD,n=32)、语义性痴呆(SD,n=16)和皮质基底节综合征(CBS,n=9)患者真实工具使用、机械问题解决和计划技能之间的关系。患者被要求选择和使用十种常见工具,解决三个机械问题,并完成伦敦塔测试。使用 Purdue Pegboard 测试和 BEC96 问卷分别控制运动功能和情节记忆。应用数据转换方法避免天花板效应,并根据原始分数和完成时间进行单病例分析。所有组均表现出工具使用障碍或速度减慢。计划缺陷仅在 AD 组中发现。机械问题解决缺陷仅在 AD 和 CBS 组中观察到。伦敦塔测试的表现是 AD 组工具使用技能的最佳预测指标,表明这些患者存在一般而非机械问题解决缺陷。情节记忆似乎在表现中作用不大。运动功能障碍往往与 CBS 患者的工具使用技能相关,而工具使用障碍则被解释为 SD 中语义丧失的结果,与以前的研究一致。这些发现可能鼓励护理人员针对疾病进行干预。