Basques Bryce A, Long William D, Golinvaux Nicholas S, Bohl Daniel D, Samuel Andre M, Lukasiewicz Adam M, Webb Matthew L, Grauer Jonathan N
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 800 Howard Avenue, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St, Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 800 Howard Avenue, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Spine J. 2017 Jun;17(6):784-789. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.040. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
Multiple methods are used to measure proximal junctional angle (PJA) and diagnose proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS); however, there is no gold standard. Previous studies using the three most common measurement methods, upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV)+1, UIV+2, and UIV to T2, have minimized the difficulty in obtaining these measurements, and often exclude patients for which measurements cannot be recorded.
The purpose of this study is to assess the technical feasibility of measuring PJA and PJK in a series of AIS patients who have undergone posterior instrumented fusion and to assess the variability in results depending on the measurement technique used.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective cohort study was carried out.
There were 460 radiographs from 98 patients with AIS who underwent posterior spinal fusion at a single institution from 2006 through 2012.
The outcomes for this study were the ability to obtain a PJA measurement for each method, the ability to diagnose PJK, and the inter- and intra-rater reliability of these measurements.
Proximal junctional angle was determined by measuring the sagittal Cobb angle on preoperative and postoperative lateral upright films using the three most common methods (UIV+1, UIV+2, and UIV to T2). The ability to obtain a PJA measurement, the ability to assess PJK, and the total number of patients with a PJK diagnosis were tabulated for each method based on established definitions. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of each measurement method was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).
A total of 460 radiographs from 98 patients were evaluated. The average number of radiographs per patient was 5.3±1.7 (mean±standard deviation), with an average follow-up of 2.1 years (780±562 days). A PJA measurement was only readable on 13%-18% of preoperative filmsand 31%-49% of postoperative films (range based on measurement technique). Only 12%-31% of films were able to be assessed for PJK based on established definitions. The rate of PJK diagnosis ranged from 1% to 29%. Of these diagnoses, 21%-100% disappeared on at least one subsequent film for the given patient. ICC ranges for intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.730-0.799 and 0.794-0.836, respectively.
This study suggests significant limitations of the three most common methods of measuring and diagnosing PJK. The results of studies using these methods can be significantly affected based on the exclusion of patients for whom measurements cannot be made and choice of measurement technique.
多种方法用于测量青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)融合术后的近端交界角(PJA)并诊断近端交界后凸(PJK);然而,尚无金标准。以往使用三种最常用测量方法(上固定椎(UIV)+1、UIV+2以及UIV至T2)的研究,已将获取这些测量值的难度降至最低,且常常排除无法记录测量值的患者。
本研究的目的是评估在一系列接受后路器械融合的AIS患者中测量PJA和PJK的技术可行性,并根据所使用的测量技术评估结果的变异性。
研究设计/地点:进行了一项回顾性队列研究。
2006年至2012年在单一机构接受后路脊柱融合的98例AIS患者的460张X线片。
本研究的结果包括每种方法获得PJA测量值的能力、诊断PJK的能力以及这些测量值的评分者间和评分者内信度。
使用三种最常用方法(UIV+1、UIV+2以及UIV至T2),通过测量术前和术后站立位侧位片上的矢状面Cobb角来确定近端交界角。根据既定定义,将每种方法获得PJA测量值的能力、评估PJK的能力以及诊断为PJK的患者总数制成表格。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估每种测量方法的评分者内和评分者间信度。
共评估了98例患者的460张X线片。每位患者的平均X线片数量为5.3±1.7(平均值±标准差),平均随访时间为2.1年(780±562天)。仅13%-18%的术前片和31%-49%的术后片(基于测量技术的范围)上可读取PJA测量值。根据既定定义,仅12%-31%的X线片能够用于评估PJK。PJK的诊断率为1%至29%。在这些诊断中,21%-100%在该特定患者的至少一张后续X线片上消失。评分者内和评分者间信度的ICC范围分别为0.730-0.799和0.794-0.836。
本研究提示三种最常用的测量和诊断PJK方法存在显著局限性。基于排除无法测量的患者以及测量技术的选择,使用这些方法的研究结果可能会受到显著影响。