Yang Fan Nils, Pan Jing Samantha, Li Xinwang
Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
Physiol Behav. 2016 Jan 1;153:125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.10.032. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
Clinical studies have shown that patients with exaggerated risk-taking tendencies have high baseline levels of norepinephrine. In this work, we systemically manipulated norepinephrine levels in rats and studied their behavioral changes in a probabilistic discounting task, which is a paradigm for gauging risk taking.
This study aims to explore the effects of the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (atomoxetine at doses of 0.6, 1.0 and 1.8 mg/kg), and receptor selective antagonists (propranolol at a single dose of 1.0/kg, and prazosin at a single dose of 0.1 mg/kg), on risk taking using a probabilistic discounting task. In this task, there were two levers available to rats: pressing the 'small/certain' lever guaranteed a single food pellet, and pressing the 'large/risky' lever yielded either four pellets or none. The probability of receiving four food pellets decreased across the four experimental blocks from 100% to 12.5%.
Atomoxetine increased the tendency to choose the large/risky lever. It significantly reduced the lose-shift effect (i.e. pressing a different lever after losing a trial), but did not affect the win-stay effect (i.e. pressing the same lever after winning a trial). Furthermore, co-administration of beta-adrenoreceptor antagonist, propranolol, eliminated the effects of atomoxetine on risk taking and the lose-shift effect; but co-administration of alpha1-adrenoreceptor antagonist, prazosin, did not.
Atomoxetine boosted NE levels and increased risk taking. This was because atomoxetine decreased rats' sensitivity to losses. These effects were likely mediated by beta-adrenoreceptor.
临床研究表明,具有过度冒险倾向的患者去甲肾上腺素基线水平较高。在本研究中,我们系统性地改变了大鼠体内的去甲肾上腺素水平,并在概率折扣任务中研究了它们的行为变化,概率折扣任务是一种衡量冒险行为的范式。
本研究旨在探讨选择性去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(托莫西汀,剂量分别为0.6、1.0和1.8mg/kg)以及受体选择性拮抗剂(普萘洛尔,单次剂量为1.0mg/kg;哌唑嗪,单次剂量为0.1mg/kg)对大鼠冒险行为的影响,采用概率折扣任务进行研究。在此任务中,大鼠有两个杠杆可供选择:按下“小/确定”杠杆可保证获得一粒食物颗粒,按下“大/冒险”杠杆则可能获得四粒食物颗粒,也可能一无所获。在四个实验阶段中,获得四粒食物颗粒的概率从100%降至12.5%。
托莫西汀增加了选择“大/冒险”杠杆的倾向。它显著降低了失败转换效应(即在一次试验失败后按下不同的杠杆),但不影响成功保持效应(即在一次试验成功后按下相同的杠杆)。此外,联合使用β-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂普萘洛尔可消除托莫西汀对冒险行为和失败转换效应的影响;但联合使用α1-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂哌唑嗪则没有这种作用。
托莫西汀提高了去甲肾上腺素水平并增加了冒险行为。这是因为托莫西汀降低了大鼠对损失的敏感性。这些效应可能是由β-肾上腺素能受体介导的。