Suppr超能文献

Ⅱ类MOD洞型中可流动大块充填树脂复合材料的粘结强度

Bond Strength of a Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Class II MOD Cavities.

作者信息

Kumagai Rose Yakushijin, Zeidan Leonardo Colombo, Rodrigues Jose Augusto, Reis André Figueiredo, Roulet Jean-François

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2015 Aug;17(5):427-32. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35012.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a bulk-fill low-stress resin-based composite to dentin from gingival walls of Class II MOD cavities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Class II MOD cavities were prepared in 44 human molars with the distal and mesial proximal boxes 4 and 6 mm deep, respectively. Eight experimental groups (n = 11) were obtained by a factorial design including 1. "composite" in two levels: a bulk-fill low-stress composite (SureFil SDR Flow, Dentsply Caulk) and a conventional composite (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE); 2. "filling technique" in two levels: bulk-fill (Bf) and incremental (In); and 3. "depth" in two levels: 4 mm and 6 mm in order to create different polymerization conditions. Twenty-four hours after placement of restorations, teeth were sectioned into beams with a cross-sectional bonded area of approximately 1 mm2. Bonded beams obtained from the gingival walls of the proximal boxes were tested in tension at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were submitted to a 3-way ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

ANOVA failed to identify significant differences for the triple and double interaction between factors. However, significant differences were observed for the factors "composite" and "filling technique" (p < 0.05). SDR presented significantly higher μTBS values for bulk and incremental filling techniques (p < 0.05), and the incremental filling technique presented significantly higher μTBS values for both composites (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that the bulk-fill flowable composite SDR may improve the bond strength to the gingival walls of Class II MOD cavities.

摘要

目的

评估一种大块充填低应力树脂基复合材料与Ⅱ类MOD洞龈壁牙本质之间的微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)。

材料与方法

在44颗人磨牙上制备Ⅱ类MOD洞,远中及近中邻面盒分别深4mm和6mm。通过析因设计得到8个实验组(n = 11),包括:1. “复合材料”有两个水平:一种大块充填低应力复合材料(SureFil SDR Flow,登士柏卡沃)和一种传统复合材料(Filtek Z350 XT,3M ESPE);2. “充填技术”有两个水平:大块充填(Bf)和分层充填(In);3. “深度”有两个水平:4mm和6mm,以创造不同的聚合条件。修复体放置24小时后,将牙齿切成横截面粘结面积约为1mm²的小梁。从邻面盒龈壁获得的粘结小梁以1mm/min的十字头速度进行拉伸测试。数据进行三因素方差分析,随后进行事后Tukey检验(p < 0.05)。

结果

方差分析未发现因素间三重和双重交互作用的显著差异。然而,观察到“复合材料”和“充填技术”因素存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。对于大块充填和分层充填技术,SDR的μTBS值显著更高(p < 0.05),并且对于两种复合材料,分层充填技术的μTBS值均显著更高(p < 0.05)。

结论

可以得出结论,大块充填可流动复合材料SDR可能会提高与Ⅱ类MOD洞龈壁的粘结强度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验