Crawford Cindy, Boyd Courtney, Jain Shamini, Khorsan Raheleh, Jonas Wayne
Samueli Institute, 1737 King Street, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA, 22314, USA.
Samueli Institute, 2101 East Coast Hwy., Suite 300, Corona del Mar, CA, 92625, USA.
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 2;8:631. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1604-z.
Systematic reviews (SRs) are widely recognized as the best means of synthesizing clinical research. However, traditional approaches can be costly and time-consuming and can be subject to selection and judgment bias. It can also be difficult to interpret the results of a SR in a meaningful way in order to make research recommendations, clinical or policy decisions, or practice guidelines. Samueli Institute has developed the Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL) SR process to address these issues. REAL provides up-to-date, rigorous, high quality SR information on health care practices, products, or programs in a streamlined, efficient and reliable manner. This process is a component of the Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH™) program developed by Samueli Institute, which aims at answering the question of "What works?" in health care.
METHODS/DESIGN: The REAL process (1) tailors a standardized search strategy to a specific and relevant research question developed with various stakeholders to survey the available literature; (2) evaluates the quantity and quality of the literature using structured tools and rulebooks to ensure objectivity, reliability and reproducibility of reviewer ratings in an independent fashion and; (3) obtains formalized, balanced input from trained subject matter experts on the implications of the evidence for future research and current practice.
Online tools and quality assurance processes are utilized for each step of the review to ensure a rapid, rigorous, reliable, transparent and reproducible SR process.
The REAL is a rapid SR process developed to streamline and aid in the rigorous and reliable evaluation and review of claims in health care in order to make evidence-based, informed decisions, and has been used by a variety of organizations aiming to gain insight into "what works" in health care. Using the REAL system allows for the facilitation of recommendations on appropriate next steps in policy, funding, and research and for making clinical and field decisions in a timely, transparent, and cost-effective manner.
系统评价(SRs)被广泛认为是综合临床研究的最佳方法。然而,传统方法可能成本高昂且耗时,还可能存在选择和判断偏差。此外,要以有意义的方式解读系统评价的结果以提出研究建议、做出临床或政策决策或制定实践指南也可能很困难。萨缪利研究所开发了文献快速证据评估(REAL)系统评价流程来解决这些问题。REAL以精简、高效且可靠的方式提供有关医疗保健实践、产品或项目的最新、严谨、高质量的系统评价信息。该流程是萨缪利研究所开发的医疗保健索赔科学评估与审查(SEaRCH™)计划的一个组成部分,该计划旨在回答医疗保健中“什么有效?”的问题。
方法/设计:REAL流程(1)根据与各利益相关者共同制定的特定且相关的研究问题,定制标准化检索策略以检索现有文献;(2)使用结构化工具和规则手册评估文献的数量和质量,以独立方式确保评审员评分的客观性、可靠性和可重复性;(3)从训练有素的主题专家处获得关于证据对未来研究和当前实践影响的正式、平衡的意见。
在评价的每个步骤都使用在线工具和质量保证流程,以确保快速、严谨、可靠、透明且可重复的系统评价流程。
REAL是一种快速系统评价流程,旨在简化并协助对医疗保健索赔进行严谨可靠的评估和审查,以便做出基于证据的明智决策,并且已被各种旨在深入了解医疗保健中“什么有效”的组织所使用。使用REAL系统有助于就政策、资金和研究的适当后续步骤提出建议,并以及时、透明且具有成本效益的方式做出临床和实际决策。