• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用MQ - 2000 PT糖化血红蛋白分析仪应用西格玛指标评估质量保证

Application of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality assurance using the MQ-2000 PT HbA1c analyzer.

作者信息

Huysal Kağan, Budak Yasemin U

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sevket Yilmaz Education and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Oct 15;25(3):416-20. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.042. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.11613/BM.2015.042
PMID:26527591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4622199/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentrations measured in clinical chemistry laboratories show large differences between their interlaboratory reported values. Laboratory measurements of quality performance should be based on quantitative data. The sigma metrics model provides an objective method for the assessment of current HbA1c assays and is useful in quality management planning. The aim of our study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the MQ-2000 PT HbA1c analyzer test results in the context of our operating conditions on the sigma scale.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The coefficient of variation was determined from the calculated mean and standard deviation evaluated from internal quality control (QC) (N=168 days) (Shanghai Huachen Biological Reagent Co. Ltd, China) data, and records of external quality data (KBUDEK, İstanbul, Turkey) measured in the period from May to November 2013 were used to determine the bias. The resulting data and total allowable error rate (TEA=10%) from the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA'88) were used to calculate the sigma level.

RESULTS

The calculated coefficient of variations (CVs) at the two levels, normal (QC1=36.6±2.38 mmol/mol) and pathological (QC2=84.7±2.68 mmol/mol), were 6.5% and 3.1%, respectively. The average bias between the external QC and MQ-2000 PT during the study period was 4.3%. The calculated average sigma value was 1.19.

CONCLUSIONS

The MQ-2000 PT HbA1c is a new analyser in the market; there is need for improvement and the method should be controlled with greater attention to ensure quality.

摘要

引言

临床化学实验室测定的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)浓度在实验室间报告值上存在很大差异。实验室质量性能的测量应基于定量数据。西格玛指标模型为评估当前HbA1c检测方法提供了一种客观方法,并且在质量管理规划中很有用。我们研究的目的是在西格玛尺度下,结合我们的操作条件评估MQ-2000 PT HbA1c分析仪检测结果的分析性能。

材料与方法

变异系数由内部质量控制(QC)(N = 168天)(中国上海华臣生物试剂有限公司)数据计算得出的均值和标准差确定,2013年5月至11月期间测量的外部质量数据记录(土耳其伊斯坦布尔KBUDEK)用于确定偏差。所得数据和1988年《临床实验室改进修正案》(CLIA'88)的总允许误差率(TEA = 10%)用于计算西格玛水平。

结果

在正常(QC1 = 36.6±2.38 mmol/mol)和病理(QC2 = 84.7±2.68 mmol/mol)两个水平下计算出的变异系数(CV)分别为6.5%和3.1%。研究期间外部QC与MQ-2000 PT之间的平均偏差为4.3%。计算出的平均西格玛值为1.19。

结论

MQ-2000 PT HbA1c是市场上的一种新型分析仪;需要改进,并且应更加注重控制该方法以确保质量。

相似文献

1
Application of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality assurance using the MQ-2000 PT HbA1c analyzer.使用MQ - 2000 PT糖化血红蛋白分析仪应用西格玛指标评估质量保证
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Oct 15;25(3):416-20. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.042. eCollection 2015.
2
Beyond the basics: Sigma scores in laboratory medicine with variable total allowable errors (TEa).超越基础:具有可变总允许误差(TEa)的实验室医学中的西格玛分数。
Clin Chim Acta. 2025 Jan 15;565:119971. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119971. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
Performance evaluation of HbA1c measurement systems with sigma metric for 1066 laboratories in China.中国 1066 家实验室采用西格玛度量法对糖化血红蛋白测量系统进行性能评估。
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Dec;487:281-286. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
Application of Six Sigma Model to Evaluate the Analytical Quality of Four HbA1c Analyzers.应用六西格玛模型评估四种糖化血红蛋白分析仪的分析质量
Clin Lab. 2017 Jan 1;63(1):79-83. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160608.
5
Boronate Affinity Chromatography Accurately Measures HbA1c also in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease - Performance Evaluation of the A1c HPLC Analyzer.硼酸亲和色谱法也能准确测定终末期肾病患者的糖化血红蛋白——A1c高效液相色谱分析仪的性能评估
Clin Lab. 2018 Sep 1;64(9):1451-1455. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180311.
6
Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Variant II Turbo HbA1c Analyzer According to Sigma Metrics.根据西格玛指标评估第二代涡轮糖化血红蛋白分析仪的分析性能
J Med Biochem. 2019 Mar 1;38(1):33-37. doi: 10.2478/jomb-2018-0014. eCollection 2019 Mar.
7
Trueness assessment of HbA1c routine assays: are processed EQA materials up to the job?糖化血红蛋白常规检测方法的准确度评估:处理后的室间质评材料能否胜任这项工作?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Sep 25;57(10):1623-1631. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0219.
8
National continuous surveys on internal quality control for HbA1c in 306 clinical laboratories of China from 2012 to 2016: Continual improvement.2012年至2016年中国306家临床实验室糖化血红蛋白室内质量控制的全国性持续调查:持续改进
J Clin Lab Anal. 2017 Sep;31(5). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22099. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
9
Assessment of Two Diabetes Point-of-care Analyzers Measuring Hemoglobin A1c in the Peruvian Amazon.评估两款在秘鲁亚马逊地区用于测量血红蛋白 A1c 的即时血糖仪。
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Nov 5;84(4):618-624. doi: 10.9204/aogh.2368.
10
Assessing quality on the Sigma scale from proficiency testing and external quality assessment surveys.根据能力验证和外部质量评估调查,在西格玛量表上评估质量。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Sep 1;53(10):1531-5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1241.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing of Defects per Million Medication Orders as a SMART Indicator for Monitoring Medication Safety in Admission and Discharge Orders.将百万用药医嘱缺陷率作为入院和出院医嘱用药安全监测的SMART指标进行测试。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 Mar 6;4(1):11-17. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-32. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Determining the Need for Repeat Testing of Blood Ethanol Concentration: Evaluation of the Synchron Blood Ethyl Alcohol Assay Kit.确定血液乙醇浓度重复检测的必要性:同步血液乙醇检测试剂盒的评估
J Med Biochem. 2019 May 11;38(3):317-322. doi: 10.2478/jomb-2018-0032. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Variant II Turbo HbA1c Analyzer According to Sigma Metrics.根据西格玛指标评估第二代涡轮糖化血红蛋白分析仪的分析性能
J Med Biochem. 2019 Mar 1;38(1):33-37. doi: 10.2478/jomb-2018-0014. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
External Quality Assessment of Glycated Hemoglobin in Iran: Comparison of Five Different Commercial Methods with Two Different Total Allowable Errors.伊朗糖化血红蛋白的外部质量评估:五种不同商业方法与两种不同总允许误差的比较
J Med Biochem. 2018 Dec 1;37(4):397-405. doi: 10.1515/jomb-2017-0057. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
The Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Immunoassay Tests by using Six-sigma Method.采用六西格玛方法评估免疫分析检测的分析性能
J Med Biochem. 2017 Oct 28;36(4):301-308. doi: 10.1515/jomb-2017-0026. eCollection 2017 Oct.
6
Sigma metrics for assessing the analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: a comparison of two approaches: Electronic supplementary material available online for this article.评估临床化学分析物分析质量的西格玛度量:两种方法的比较:本文在线提供了电子补充材料。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Jun 15;28(2):020708. doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.020708.
7
Application of Sigma Metrics and Performance Comparison Between Two Biochemistry Analyser and a Blood Gas Analyser for the Determination of Electrolytes.西格玛指标的应用以及两种生化分析仪与一台血气分析仪在电解质测定方面的性能比较
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):BC06-BC09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23486.9259. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of 2 models to set and evaluate quality targets for hb a1c: biological variation and sigma-metrics.两种用于设定和评估糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)质量目标的模型研究:生物学变异和西格玛度量
Clin Chem. 2015 May;61(5):752-9. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.235333. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
2
Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.定义分析性能规范:欧洲临床化学与检验医学联合会第一次战略会议的共识声明
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 May;53(6):833-5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0067.
3
Assessing quality on the Sigma scale from proficiency testing and external quality assessment surveys.根据能力验证和外部质量评估调查,在西格玛量表上评估质量。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Sep 1;53(10):1531-5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1241.
4
(6) Glycemic targets.(6)血糖目标。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38 Suppl:S33-40. doi: 10.2337/dc15-S009.
5
Risk management in the clinical laboratory.临床实验室中的风险管理。
Ann Lab Med. 2014 Jul;34(4):274-8. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.4.274. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
6
Comparing analytic performance criteria: evaluation of HbA1c certification criteria as an example.比较分析性能标准:以糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)认证标准评估为例
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Jun 10;433:259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.03.034. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
7
Sigma metrics used to assess analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: importance of the allowable total error (TEa) target.用于评估临床化学检测分析质量的西格玛指标:允许总误差(TEa)目标的重要性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Jul;52(7):973-80. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2013-1090.
8
Executive summary: guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.执行摘要:糖尿病诊断和管理中实验室分析的指南和建议。
Clin Chem. 2011 Jun;57(6):793-8. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.163634. Epub 2011 May 26.
9
Revaluation of biological variation of glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) using an accurately designed protocol and an assay traceable to the IFCC reference system.使用准确设计的方案和可溯源至 IFCC 参考系统的检测方法重新评估糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的生物学变异。
Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Jul 15;412(15-16):1412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.04.014. Epub 2011 Apr 17.
10
Desirable performance standards for HbA(1c) analysis - precision, accuracy and standardisation: consensus statement of the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB), the Australian Diabetes Society (ADS), the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA), Endocrine Society of Australia (ESA), and the Australian Diabetes Educators Association (ADEA).糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))分析的理想性能标准——精密度、准确度和标准化:澳大利亚临床生物化学家协会(AACB)、澳大利亚糖尿病协会(ADS)、澳大利亚皇家病理学家学会(RCPA)、澳大利亚内分泌学会(ESA)以及澳大利亚糖尿病教育者协会(ADEA)的共识声明
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(8):1083-97. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.158.