Suppr超能文献

采用热剔骨、四分切割、去 crust-freeze-air-chilling 和冷面糊切碎技术改善火鸡胸肉品质和熟凝胶功能特性。(注:原文中“crust-freeze-air-chilling”表述不太准确,可能存在拼写错误,但按照要求忠实翻译)

Improvement of turkey breast meat quality and cooked gel functionality using hot-boning, quarter sectioning, crust-freeze-air-chilling and cold-batter-mincing technologies.

作者信息

Lee H C, Erasmus M A, Swanson J C, Hong H G, Kang I

机构信息

Departments of Animal Science.

Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2016 Jan;95(1):138-43. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev313. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

Abstract

The effect of rapid carcass chilling on breast meat quality was evaluated using commercial (COMM) and random-bred (RB) turkeys. Immediately after slaughter, 48 turkeys from COMM or RB line were randomly subjected to one of four chilling methods: 1) water-immersion chilling (WIC) of the carcasses at 0°C ice slurry, 2) WIC after temperature abuse (TA) of the carcasses at 40°C for 30 min (TA-WIC), 3) hot-boning, quarter sectioning, and crust-freeze-air-chilling (HB-(1)/4CFAC) of breast fillets at -12°C, and 4) HB-(1)/4CFAC of fillets after TA of carcasses (TA-HB-(1)/4CFAC). The TA increased carcass and fillet temperatures by ∼1.3 and ∼4.1°C, respectively, regardless of turkey line, whereas HB-(1)/4CFAC of fillets required 28 and 33% of carcass chilling time for COMM and RB, respectively. During chilling, COMM breast pH rapidly reduced from 6.04 to 5.82, resulting in a significantly lower pH than RB after chilling (P < 0.05), whereas COMM R-value sharply increased from 1.17 to 1.43, causing no difference from RB (P > 0.05). Significantly higher L* value and cooking yield (P < 0.05) were seen in the samples of TA and WIC than those of no TA and HB-(1)/4CFAC, respectively, with no difference observed between COMM and RB fillets (P > 0.05). Higher values of hardness, gumminess, and chewiness were found for RB, no TA, and HB-(1)/4CFAC gels than COMM, TA, and WIC, respectively. These results generally indicated that protein quality and textural properties of turkey fillets were improved, regardless of strains or temperature abuse, using HB-(1)/4CFAC technology.

摘要

使用商业(COMM)火鸡和随机繁殖(RB)火鸡评估了快速屠体冷却对胸肉品质的影响。屠宰后立即将48只COMM或RB品系的火鸡随机采用四种冷却方法之一:1)在0°C冰浆中对屠体进行水浸冷却(WIC);2)屠体在40°C下受热30分钟后进行WIC(TA-WIC);3)胸肉在-12°C下进行热去骨、四分切割和无皮冷冻空气冷却(HB-(1)/4CFAC);4)屠体受热后对胸肉进行HB-(1)/4CFAC(TA-HB-(1)/4CFAC)。无论火鸡品系如何,受热分别使屠体和胸肉温度升高约1.3°C和4.1°C,而胸肉的HB-(1)/4CFAC冷却所需时间分别为COMM和RB屠体冷却时间的28%和33%。冷却过程中,COMM胸肉pH值从6.04迅速降至5.82,冷却后pH值显著低于RB(P<0.05),而COMM的R值从1.17急剧增至1.43,与RB无差异(P>0.05)。TA和WIC样品的L*值和烹饪产率显著高于未受热和HB-(1)/4CFAC的样品(P<0.05),COMM和RB胸肉之间无差异(P>0.05)。RB、未受热和HB-(1)/4CFAC凝胶的硬度、胶黏性和咀嚼性值分别高于COMM、受热和WIC。这些结果总体表明,使用HB-(1)/4CFAC技术,无论品系或受热情况如何,火鸡胸肉的蛋白质质量和质地特性均得到改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验