Hruska Pam, Hecker Kent G, Coderre Sylvain, McLaughlin Kevin, Cortese Filomeno, Doig Christopher, Beran Tanya, Wright Bruce, Krigolson Olav
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Dec;21(5):921-933. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9648-3. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
Clinical decision making requires knowledge, experience and analytical/non-analytical types of decision processes. As clinicians progress from novice to expert, research indicates decision-making becomes less reliant on foundational biomedical knowledge and more on previous experience. In this study, we investigated how knowledge and experience were reflected in terms of differences in neural areas of activation. Novice and expert clinicians diagnosed simple or complex (easy, hard) cases while functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected. Our results highlight key differences in the neural areas activated in novices and experts during the clinical decision-making process. fMRI data were collected from ten second year medical students (novices) and ten practicing gastroenterologists (experts) while they diagnosed sixteen (eight easy and eight hard) clinical cases via multiple-choice questions. Behavioral data were collected for diagnostic accuracy (correct/incorrect diagnosis) and time taken to assign a clinical diagnosis. Two analyses were performed with the fMRI data. First, data from easy and hard cases were compared within respective groups (easy > hard, hard > easy). Second, neural differences between novices and experts (novice > expert, expert > novice) were assessed. Experts correctly diagnosed more cases than novices and made their diagnoses faster than novices on both easy and hard cases (all p's < 0.05). Time taken to diagnose hard cases took significantly longer for both novices and experts. While similar neural areas were activated in both novices and experts during the decision making process, we identified significant hemispheric activation differences between novice and expert clinicians when diagnosing hard clinical cases. Specifically, novice clinicians had greater activations in the left anterior temporal cortex and left ventral lateral prefrontal cortex whereas expert clinicians had greater activations in the right dorsal lateral, right ventral lateral, and right parietal cortex. Hemispheric differences in activation were not observed between novices and experts while diagnosing easy clinical cases. While clinical decision-making engaged the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in both novices and experts, interestingly we observed expertise related differences in the regions and hemispheres of PFC activation between these groups for hard clinical cases. Specifically, in novices we observed activations in left hemisphere neural regions associated with factual rule-based knowledge, whereas in experts we observed right hemisphere activation in neural regions associated with experiential knowledge. Importantly, at the neural level, our data highlight differences in so called type 2 clinical decision-making processes related to prior knowledge and experience.
临床决策需要知识、经验以及分析性/非分析性的决策过程。随着临床医生从新手成长为专家,研究表明决策越来越少依赖基础生物医学知识,而更多依赖以往经验。在本研究中,我们调查了知识和经验在神经激活区域差异方面是如何体现的。新手和专家级临床医生在诊断简单或复杂(容易、困难)病例时,同时收集功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据。我们的结果突出了新手和专家在临床决策过程中神经激活区域的关键差异。当十名二年级医学生(新手)和十名执业胃肠病学家(专家)通过多项选择题诊断十六个(八个容易和八个困难)临床病例时,收集了fMRI数据。收集了关于诊断准确性(正确/错误诊断)和做出临床诊断所需时间的行为数据。对fMRI数据进行了两项分析。首先,在各自组内比较容易和困难病例的数据(容易>困难,困难>容易)。其次,评估新手和专家之间的神经差异(新手>专家,专家>新手)。在容易和困难病例上,专家正确诊断的病例比新手多,且做出诊断的速度比新手快(所有p值<0.05)。新手和专家诊断困难病例所花费的时间都明显更长。虽然在决策过程中新手和专家激活的神经区域相似,但我们发现在诊断困难临床病例时,新手和专家级临床医生之间存在显著的半球激活差异。具体而言,新手临床医生在左前颞叶皮质和左腹外侧前额叶皮质有更强的激活,而专家临床医生在右背外侧、右腹外侧和右顶叶皮质有更强的激活。在诊断容易临床病例时,未观察到新手和专家之间的半球激活差异。虽然临床决策在新手和专家中都涉及前额叶皮质(PFC),但有趣的是,我们观察到在诊断困难临床病例时,这些组之间在PFC激活的区域和半球存在与专业知识相关的差异。具体而言,在新手中,我们观察到与基于事实规则的知识相关的左半球神经区域激活,而在专家中,我们观察到与经验知识相关的右半球神经区域激活。重要的是,在神经层面,我们的数据突出了与先验知识和经验相关的所谓2型临床决策过程中的差异。