• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验性使用头孢曲松±阿奇霉素治疗由甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌引起的社区获得性肺炎的效果不佳。

Poor outcomes of empiric ceftriaxone ± azithromycin for community-acquired pneumonia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

作者信息

So Wonhee, Crandon Jared L, Nicolau David P

机构信息

Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour St, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour St, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;11(4):545-51. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1345-y. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11739-015-1345-y
PMID:26531307
Abstract

While ceftriaxone 1 g q24h is commonly used for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the prescribing information recommends 2-4 g a day to treat methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Similarly, recent pharmacodynamic analyses suggest shortcomings of 1 g q24h against the bulk of the MSSA. We evaluated the outcomes of empiric ceftriaxone 1 g q24h ± azithromycin in patients with MSSA pneumonia, as compared with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Adult patients admitted to Hartford Hospital from 1/2005 to 12/2014 with respiratory culture for MSSA or S. pneumoniae were considered for inclusion. Non-ICU, CAP patients were included. Early clinical failure (ECF) was defined as persistent signs/symptoms or change of antibiotic due to poor response at 72-96 h. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of ECF. Over the study period, 403 MSSA and 227 S. pneumoniae positive respiratory cultures were identified. The majority of patients were excluded due to the following: no signs/symptoms of pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, alternative antibiotics, and polymicrobial infection. Thirty-nine patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. All but three patients in the S. pneumoniae group received ceftriaxone + azithromycin. ECF was greater in the MSSA group (53 vs. 4 %, P = 0.003), as was length of stay (7.5 ± 5.4 vs. 4.6 ± 3.3 days, P = 0.006). When controlling for disease severity and macrolide non-susceptibility in a multivariate analysis, MSSA was significantly correlated with ECF (OR 12.3, 95 % CI 0.8-188.8). Poor clinical outcomes were observed in patients empirically treated with ceftriaxone ± azithromycin for MSSA CAP. Despite the popularity of ceftriaxone 1 g q24h, these data suggest this dose or compound may be inadequate for CAP caused by MSSA.

摘要

虽然头孢曲松1克每日1次常用于社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的住院患者,但药品说明书推荐每日使用2 - 4克来治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)。同样,近期的药效学分析表明,每日1次1克的剂量对于大多数MSSA存在不足之处。我们评估了经验性使用头孢曲松1克每日1次±阿奇霉素治疗MSSA肺炎患者与肺炎链球菌患者的疗效对比。纳入2005年1月至2014年12月入住哈特福德医院且呼吸道培养出MSSA或肺炎链球菌的成年患者。纳入非重症监护病房的CAP患者。早期临床失败(ECF)定义为在72 - 96小时出现持续的体征/症状或因反应不佳而更换抗生素。进行多因素分析以评估ECF的预测因素。在研究期间,共识别出403例MSSA阳性和227例肺炎链球菌阳性的呼吸道培养结果。大多数患者因以下原因被排除:无肺炎体征/症状、医院获得性肺炎、使用其他抗生素以及混合感染。39例患者符合纳入/排除标准。肺炎链球菌组除3例患者外均接受头孢曲松 + 阿奇霉素治疗。MSSA组的ECF更高(53%对4%,P = 0.003),住院时间也更长(7.5 ± 5.4天对4.6 ± 3.3天,P = 0.006)。在多因素分析中控制疾病严重程度和大环内酯类不敏感性后,MSSA与ECF显著相关(OR 12.3,95%CI 0.8 - 188.8)。经验性使用头孢曲松±阿奇霉素治疗MSSA CAP患者观察到临床结局不佳。尽管头孢曲松1克每日1次很常用,但这些数据表明该剂量或组合可能不足以治疗由MSSA引起的CAP。

相似文献

1
Poor outcomes of empiric ceftriaxone ± azithromycin for community-acquired pneumonia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.经验性使用头孢曲松±阿奇霉素治疗由甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌引起的社区获得性肺炎的效果不佳。
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;11(4):545-51. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1345-y. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
2
Levofloxacin Versus Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin Combination in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients.左氧氟沙星与头孢曲松和阿奇霉素联合用药治疗住院患者社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较
Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2018;13(3):228-239. doi: 10.2174/1574891X13666181024154526.
3
A multicenter, open-label, randomized comparison of levofloxacin and azithromycin plus ceftriaxone in hospitalized adults with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia.左氧氟沙星与阿奇霉素加头孢曲松在中重度社区获得性肺炎住院成人患者中的多中心、开放标签、随机对照比较
Clin Ther. 2002 Aug;24(8):1292-308. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80034-0.
4
Clinical and bacteriological outcomes in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with azithromycin plus ceftriaxone, or ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin or erythromycin: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.阿奇霉素联合头孢曲松、或头孢曲松联合克拉霉素或红霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者的临床和细菌学转归:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Feb;13(2):162-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01633.x.
5
Medical resource utilization among community-acquired pneumonia patients initially treated with levofloxacin 750 mg daily versus ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily: a US-based study.初始接受每日750毫克左氧氟沙星治疗与每日1000毫克头孢曲松加500毫克阿奇霉素治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的医疗资源利用情况:一项美国的研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Apr;25(4):859-68. doi: 10.1185/03007990902779749.
6
Relationship between time to clinical response and outcomes among Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class III and IV hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who received ceftriaxone and azithromycin.肺炎结局研究团队(PORT)风险分级为III级和IV级的社区获得性肺炎住院患者接受头孢曲松和阿奇霉素治疗后临床反应时间与结局之间的关系。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jul;58(7):3804-13. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02632-13. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
7
[Antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens isolated from adults in China during 2009 and 2010].[2009年至2010年期间从中国成年人中分离出的社区获得性呼吸道病原体的抗菌药敏性]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;35(2):113-9.
8
Efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, including patients with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infection.阿奇霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效,包括对大环内酯类耐药的肺炎链球菌感染患者。
Intern Med. 2009;48(7):527-35. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.1482. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
9
[Analysis of the efficiency of antimicrobial treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in clinical practice].[临床实践中社区获得性肺炎抗菌治疗的疗效分析]
Ter Arkh. 2017;89(8):17-21. doi: 10.17116/terarkh201789817-21.
10
Comparison of community-acquired pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus producing the Panton-Valentine leukocidin.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌所致社区获得性肺炎的比较。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Dec;13(12):1476-85.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Surrogate Susceptibility of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin for Commonly Utilized Parenteral Agents against Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: Focus on Ceftriaxone Discordance between Predictive Susceptibility and in Vivo Exposures.评估苯唑西林和头孢西丁对常用肠外制剂针对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌的替代敏感性:关注头孢曲松在预测敏感性与体内暴露之间的不一致性。
Pathogens. 2015 Jul 30;4(3):599-605. doi: 10.3390/pathogens4030599.
2
Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Hospitalization among U.S. Adults.美国成年人中需要住院治疗的社区获得性肺炎
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):415-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500245. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
3
Activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents tested against Staphylococcus aureus from patients with bloodstream infections in US medical centres (2009-13).
美国医疗中心血流感染患者金黄色葡萄球菌的头孢洛林及对照药物活性检测(2009-2013 年)。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jul;70(7):2053-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv076. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
4
In vitro activity of human-simulated epithelial lining fluid exposures of ceftaroline, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.头孢洛林、头孢曲松和万古霉素在人模拟上皮衬液暴露下对甲氧西林敏感和耐药金黄色葡萄球菌的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Dec;58(12):7520-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03742-14. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
5
Pharmacodynamic profile of commonly utilised parenteral therapies against meticillin-susceptible and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus collected from US hospitals.美国医院分离的耐甲氧西林敏感和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌常用肠外治疗药物的药效学特征。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Sep;44(3):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
6
Treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteoarticular and prosthetic joint infections: using the oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentration to guide appropriate ceftriaxone use.甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌骨关节炎和人工关节感染的治疗:利用苯唑西林最低抑菌浓度指导头孢曲松的合理使用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jul;57(1):161-2. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit188. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
7
Length of stay after reaching clinical stability drives hospital costs associated with adult community-acquired pneumonia.达到临床稳定后的住院时间决定了与成人社区获得性肺炎相关的医院成本。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;45(3):219-26. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.726737. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
8
FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.重点 2:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心 III 期临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii33-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr097.
9
FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.重点 1:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心、III 期临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii19-32. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr096.
10
Association between time to clinical stability and outcomes after discharge in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.住院社区获得性肺炎患者临床稳定时间与出院后结局的关系。
Chest. 2011 Aug;140(2):482-488. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2895. Epub 2011 Feb 17.