• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左氧氟沙星与阿奇霉素加头孢曲松在中重度社区获得性肺炎住院成人患者中的多中心、开放标签、随机对照比较

A multicenter, open-label, randomized comparison of levofloxacin and azithromycin plus ceftriaxone in hospitalized adults with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Frank Elliott, Liu Jing, Kinasewitz Gary, Moran Gregory J, Oross Margaret P, Olson William H, Reichl Veronica, Freitag Susan, Bahal Neelam, Wiesinger Barbara A, Tennenberg Alan, Kahn James B

机构信息

Jersey Shore Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2002 Aug;24(8):1292-308. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80034-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80034-0
PMID:12240780
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Changing etiologic patterns and the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance, particularly an increase in macrolide-resistant pneumococcal bacteremia, are causing physicians to adopt new approaches to the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

OBJECTIVE

The relative efficacy and tolerability of levofloxacin monotherapy and azithromycin and ceftriaxone combination therapy were assessed in hospitalized adults with moderate to severe CAP.

METHODS

This Phase IV, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial compared 2 treatment regimens: (1) levofloxacin 500 mg PO or IV q24h, and (2) azithromycin 500 mg IV q24h for > or = 2 days plus ceftriaxone 1 g IV q24h for 2 days, followed by an optional transition to azithromycin 500 mg PO q24h at the investigator's discretion. The total duration of therapy was to be a minimum of 10 days in both treatment groups. Ceftriaxone was included in the initial azithromycin regimen to ensure coverage against pneumococcal bacteremia.

RESULTS

Of 236 patients in the intent-to-treat population, completion or withdrawal information was available for 110 patients in the levofloxacin group and 114 in the azithromycin group. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were comparable between groups. At the end of treatment, the clinical success rate (cured + improved) in clinically evaluable patients was 94.1% in the levofloxacin group and 92.3% in the azithromycin group. The respective posttherapy microbiologic eradication rates were 89.5% and 92.3%. Levofloxacin was as well tolerated as azithromycin, with an incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) for all body systems of 5.3% and 9.3%, respectively. None of the drug-related AEs were considered serious [corrected].

CONCLUSIONS

In this study in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe CAP, levofloxacin monotherapy was at least as effective as a combination regimen of azithromycin and ceftriaxone in providing coverage against the current causative pathogens in CAP. In addition, levofloxacin was as well tolerated as the combination of azithromycin and ceftriaxone.

摘要

背景

病因模式的改变以及抗菌药物耐药性问题的日益严重,尤其是耐大环内酯类肺炎球菌菌血症的增加,促使医生采用新的方法来治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)。

目的

评估左氧氟沙星单药治疗与阿奇霉素和头孢曲松联合治疗对中重度CAP住院成人患者的相对疗效和耐受性。

方法

这项IV期、多中心、开放标签、随机试验比较了2种治疗方案:(1)左氧氟沙星500mg口服或静脉注射,每24小时1次;(2)阿奇霉素500mg静脉注射,每24小时1次,持续≥2天,加头孢曲松1g静脉注射,每24小时1次,共2天,随后根据研究者的判断可选择过渡为阿奇霉素500mg口服,每24小时1次。两个治疗组的总疗程均至少为10天。头孢曲松包含在初始阿奇霉素治疗方案中,以确保覆盖肺炎球菌菌血症。

结果

在意向性治疗人群的236例患者中,左氧氟沙星组110例和阿奇霉素组114例患者有完成或退出研究的信息。两组间的基线人口统计学和疾病特征具有可比性。治疗结束时,临床可评估患者的临床成功率(治愈+改善)在左氧氟沙星组为94.1%,在阿奇霉素组为92.3%。治疗后各自的微生物清除率分别为89.5%和92.3%。左氧氟沙星与阿奇霉素的耐受性相当,所有身体系统的药物相关不良事件(AE)发生率分别为5.3%和9.3%。没有药物相关AE被认为是严重的[校正后]。

结论

在这项针对中重度CAP住院患者的研究中,左氧氟沙星单药治疗在覆盖当前CAP致病病原体方面至少与阿奇霉素和头孢曲松联合治疗方案一样有效。此外,左氧氟沙星与阿奇霉素和头孢曲松联合用药的耐受性相当。

相似文献

1
A multicenter, open-label, randomized comparison of levofloxacin and azithromycin plus ceftriaxone in hospitalized adults with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia.左氧氟沙星与阿奇霉素加头孢曲松在中重度社区获得性肺炎住院成人患者中的多中心、开放标签、随机对照比较
Clin Ther. 2002 Aug;24(8):1292-308. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80034-0.
2
Comparative efficacies and tolerabilities of intravenous azithromycin plus ceftriaxone and intravenous levofloxacin with step-down oral therapy for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia.静脉注射阿奇霉素联合头孢曲松与静脉注射左氧氟沙星序贯口服治疗中重度社区获得性肺炎住院患者的疗效和耐受性比较
Treat Respir Med. 2004;3(5):329-36. doi: 10.2165/00151829-200403050-00006.
3
Levofloxacin Versus Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin Combination in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients.左氧氟沙星与头孢曲松和阿奇霉素联合用药治疗住院患者社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较
Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2018;13(3):228-239. doi: 10.2174/1574891X13666181024154526.
4
Medical resource utilization among community-acquired pneumonia patients initially treated with levofloxacin 750 mg daily versus ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily: a US-based study.初始接受每日750毫克左氧氟沙星治疗与每日1000毫克头孢曲松加500毫克阿奇霉素治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的医疗资源利用情况:一项美国的研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Apr;25(4):859-68. doi: 10.1185/03007990902779749.
5
A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.一项多中心随机研究,比较静脉注射和/或口服左氧氟沙星与头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Sep;41(9):1965-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.9.1965.
6
Clinical and bacteriological outcomes in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with azithromycin plus ceftriaxone, or ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin or erythromycin: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.阿奇霉素联合头孢曲松、或头孢曲松联合克拉霉素或红霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者的临床和细菌学转归:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Feb;13(2):162-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01633.x.
7
Intravenous azithromycin plus ceftriaxone followed by oral azithromycin for the treatment of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia: an open-label, non-comparative multicenter trial.静脉注射阿奇霉素加头孢曲松,随后口服阿奇霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者:一项开放标签、非对照的多中心试验。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2008 Jun;12(3):202-9. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702008000300008.
8
A cost-minimization analysis comparing azithromycin-based and levofloxacin-based protocols for the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the CAP-IN trial.一项成本最小化分析,比较基于阿奇霉素和基于左氧氟沙星的方案治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者的效果:社区获得性肺炎住院治疗(CAP-IN)试验结果
Chest. 2005 Nov;128(5):3246-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3246.
9
Oral gemifloxacin versus sequential therapy with intravenous ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime with or without a macrolide in the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of clinical efficacy and tolerability.口服吉米沙星与静脉注射头孢曲松/口服头孢呋辛序贯治疗(联合或不联合大环内酯类药物)在社区获得性肺炎住院患者治疗中的应用:一项关于临床疗效和耐受性的随机、开放标签、多中心研究
Clin Ther. 2002 Nov;24(11):1915-36. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80088-1.
10
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, retrospective comparison of 5- and 10-day regimens of levofloxacin in a subgroup of patients aged > or =65 years with community-acquired pneumonia.在年龄≥65岁的社区获得性肺炎患者亚组中,对左氧氟沙星5天和10天治疗方案进行的多中心、随机、双盲、回顾性比较。
Clin Ther. 2005 Aug;27(8):1251-9. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(05)80214-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of combining antibiotics on resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.联合使用抗生素对耐药性的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Elife. 2024 Dec 20;13:RP93740. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93740.
2
The Effect of Macrolides on Mortality in Bacteremic Pneumococcal Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Nationwide Cohort Study, Israel, 2009-2017.大环内酯类药物对菌血症性肺炎链球菌肺炎死亡率的影响:一项回顾性、全国性队列研究,以色列,2009-2017 年。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 19;75(12):2219-2224. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac317.
3
Comparative efficacy of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in combination with beta-lactams to treat community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients: a systematic review.
阿奇霉素与克拉霉素联合β-内酰胺类药物治疗住院社区获得性肺炎患者的疗效比较:系统评价。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Oct;49(10):3000605211049943. doi: 10.1177/03000605211049943.
4
Intravenous Ceftriaxone Versus Multiple Dosing Regimes of Intravenous Anti-Staphylococcal Antibiotics for Methicillin-Susceptible (MSSA): A Systematic Review.静脉注射头孢曲松与静脉注射抗葡萄球菌抗生素多剂量方案治疗甲氧西林敏感(MSSA):一项系统评价。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Jan 21;9(2):39. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020039.
5
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗。美国胸科学会和美国传染病学会的官方临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST.
6
Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis.呼吸喹诺酮类单药治疗与β-内酰胺类联合或不联合大环内酯类治疗住院社区获得性肺炎患者的Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 8;10:489. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00489. eCollection 2019.
7
Antibiotic therapy, supportive treatment and management of immunomodulation-inflammation response in community acquired pneumonia: review of recommendations.社区获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗、支持性治疗及免疫调节-炎症反应管理:推荐意见综述
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2017 Oct 5;12:26. doi: 10.1186/s40248-017-0106-3. eCollection 2017.
8
A randomized, open, multicenter clinical study on the short course of intravenous infusion of 750 mg of levofloxacin and the sequential standard course of intravenous infusion/oral administration of 500 mg of levofloxacin for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.一项关于750毫克左氧氟沙星短程静脉输注与500毫克左氧氟沙星静脉输注/口服序贯标准疗程治疗社区获得性肺炎的随机、开放、多中心临床研究。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):2473-2484. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.30.
9
Comparative Treatment Failure Rates of Respiratory Fluoroquinolones or β-Lactam + Macrolide Versus β-Lactam Alone in the Treatment for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adult Outpatients: An Analysis of a Nationally Representative Claims Database.呼吸氟喹诺酮类药物或β-内酰胺类+大环内酯类药物与单用β-内酰胺类药物治疗成人门诊社区获得性肺炎的比较治疗失败率:一项基于全国代表性索赔数据库的分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(39):e1662. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001662.
10
High-dose levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, open-label study.社区获得性肺炎高剂量左氧氟沙星治疗:一项随机、开放标签研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Sep 1;32(9):569-76. doi: 10.1007/BF03261911.