Thompson Brennan J, Conchola Eric C, Stock Matt S
Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Applied Musculoskeletal and Human Physiology Research Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Age (Dordr). 2015 Dec;37(6):111. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9845-2. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
Short-term strength and power recovery patterns following fatigue have received little research attention, particularly as they pertain to age-specific responses, and the leg flexors (i.e., hamstrings) muscle group. Thus, research is warranted addressing these issues because both age-related alterations in the neuromuscular system and mode of muscle action (e.g., eccentric, concentric, isometric) may differentially influence recovery responses from fatigue. The aim of this study was to investigate the strength and power recovery responses for eccentric, concentric, and isometric muscle actions of the leg flexors in young and older men following an isometric, intermittent fatigue-inducing protocol. Nineteen young (age = 25 ± 3 years) and nineteen older (71 ± 4) men performed maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) for eccentric, concentric, and isometric muscle actions followed by a fatigue protocol of intermittent (0.6 duty cycle) isometric contractions of the leg flexors at 60% of isometric MVC. MVCs of each muscle action were performed at 0, 7, 15, and 30 min following fatigue. Peak torque (PT) and mean power values were calculated from the MVCs and the eccentric/concentric ratio (ECR) was derived. For PT and mean power, young men showed incomplete recovery at all time phases, whereas the older men had recovered by 7 min. Eccentric and isometric muscle actions showed incomplete recovery at all time phases, but concentric recovered by 7 min, independent of age. The ECR was depressed for up to 30 min following fatigue. More rapid and pronounced recovery in older men and concentric contractions may be related to physiological differences specific to aging and muscle action motor unit patterns. Individuals and clinicians may use these time course responses as a guide for recovery following activity-induced fatigue.
疲劳后的短期力量和功率恢复模式很少受到研究关注,特别是当它们涉及特定年龄的反应以及腿部屈肌(即腘绳肌)肌群时。因此,有必要进行研究来解决这些问题,因为神经肌肉系统中与年龄相关的变化以及肌肉作用模式(例如,离心、向心、等长)可能会对疲劳后的恢复反应产生不同的影响。本研究的目的是调查年轻和老年男性在进行等长、间歇性疲劳诱导方案后,腿部屈肌的离心、向心和等长肌肉动作的力量和功率恢复反应。19名年轻男性(年龄 = 25 ± 3岁)和19名老年男性(71 ± 4岁)进行了离心、向心和等长肌肉动作的最大自主收缩(MVC),随后进行了腿部屈肌以等长MVC的60%进行间歇性(占空比0.6)等长收缩的疲劳方案。在疲劳后的0、7、15和30分钟进行每种肌肉动作的MVC。从MVC中计算出峰值扭矩(PT)和平均功率值,并得出离心/向心比率(ECR)。对于PT和平均功率,年轻男性在所有时间阶段都显示出不完全恢复,而老年男性在7分钟时已恢复。离心和等长肌肉动作在所有时间阶段都显示出不完全恢复,但向心收缩在7分钟时恢复,与年龄无关。疲劳后ECR降低长达30分钟。老年男性和向心收缩中更快速和明显的恢复可能与衰老和肌肉动作运动单位模式特有的生理差异有关。个人和临床医生可以将这些时间进程反应作为活动诱导疲劳后恢复的指导。