Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Apr;43(4):568-77. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181f9b1c4.
Despite intense interest in understanding how old age may alter skeletal muscle fatigability, a quantitative examination of the impact of study design on age-related differences in muscle fatigue does not exist.
The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the differences in muscle fatigue between young and older adults, with specific examination of moderator variables suggested to contribute to discrepancies across studies: contraction intensity, contraction mode, duty cycle, fatigue index, sex, muscle group, and contraction type.
The standardized effect of age on muscle fatigue was computed for 37 studies (60 standardized effects). Standardized effects were coded as positive when less fatigue was reported in older individuals compared with young individuals.
The overall standardized effect of age on muscle fatigue was positive (0.56). In studies using dynamic contractions or using muscle power as the index of fatigue, the standardized effect was negative (-0.12 and -2.5, respectively). The standardized effect for all other moderator categories was positive (range = 0.09-0.90), indicating less fatigue in older adults under all other methodological conditions.
This review provides the first quantitative analysis of the effect of study design on age-related differences in muscle fatigue. The results indicate that older individuals develop less muscle fatigue than young individuals, particularly during isometric contractions of the elbow flexor and knee extensor muscles. However, the results also suggest that older adults develop greater fatigue during dynamic contractions, particularly when the decline in power is assessed. Studies that verify this latter outcome are needed, as are studies designed to elucidate the mechanisms of fatigue.
尽管人们强烈关注了解衰老如何改变骨骼肌的疲劳性,但目前尚不存在对研究设计如何影响骨骼肌疲劳的年龄相关性差异进行定量检查的研究。
本研究旨在对年轻人和老年人之间的肌肉疲劳差异进行系统综述,特别检查了可能导致研究之间存在差异的调节变量:收缩强度、收缩模式、工作周期、疲劳指数、性别、肌肉群和收缩类型。
对 37 项研究(60 个标准化效应)的肌肉疲劳的年龄标准化效应进行了计算。当与年轻人相比,老年人报告的疲劳程度较低时,标准化效应被编码为正值。
肌肉疲劳的总体年龄标准化效应为正值(0.56)。在使用动态收缩或使用肌肉力量作为疲劳指标的研究中,标准化效应为负值(分别为-0.12 和-2.5)。所有其他调节类别(范围为 0.09-0.90)的标准化效应为正值,表明在所有其他方法条件下,老年人的疲劳程度较低。
本综述首次对研究设计对肌肉疲劳的年龄相关性差异的影响进行了定量分析。结果表明,与年轻人相比,老年人的肌肉疲劳程度较低,尤其是在肘屈肌和膝伸肌的等长收缩期间。然而,结果还表明,老年人在动态收缩时会产生更大的疲劳,尤其是在评估功率下降时。需要进行验证这一结果的研究,以及旨在阐明疲劳机制的研究。