Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 Dec 16;1(7):2325967113516729. doi: 10.1177/2325967113516729. eCollection 2013 Dec.
Diagnosis of pectoralis major tears early in the acute phase is important for optimizing surgical repair and outcomes. However, physical examination of pectoralis major injuries can be misleading, often resulting in a potentially detrimental delay in surgical treatment.
To establish and validate a quantifiable clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears.
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
A total of 50 healthy male participants (mean age, 43.3 ± 11.9 years) with normal uninjured pectoralis major anatomy were examined. Digital photographs of all participants were taken in the "military press" starting position (90° of shoulder abduction, 90° of shoulder external rotation). The length between the ipsilateral nipple and the apex of the pectoralis major muscle curvature along the anterior axillary fold, known as the pectoralis major distance, was measured bilaterally. Two orthopaedic surgeons measured all photographs on 2 separate occasions. The pectoralis major index (PMI) was calculated as a ratio of pectoralis major distance values to establish normal values. The PMI was also calculated in a cohort of 19 male patients (mean age, 33.8 ± 6.8 years) with a pectoralis major rupture to assess the diagnostic utility of this novel quantifiable physical examination technique.
Mean (± standard deviation) PMI for the uninjured group was 1.0 ± 0.07. A diagnostic threshold of a PMI <0.9 resulted in a sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 98%, and overall accuracy of 93% in identifying structurally significant pectoralis major ruptures. There was no correlation between PMI and age or activity level, including participation in sports and/or weight training. The PMI technique demonstrated good to excellent intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.82, 0.74) and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.63, 0.76).
The PMI technique is a simple, quantifiable, and accurate clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears. Routine application of the PMI technique by clinicians may improve accurate identification of structurally significant rupture and expedite referral to a surgical specialist for optimal treatment and outcome.
在急性阶段早期诊断胸大肌撕裂对于优化手术修复和结果非常重要。然而,胸大肌损伤的体格检查可能会产生误导,通常会导致手术治疗的潜在不利延误。
建立并验证一种用于结构性显著胸大肌撕裂的可量化临床诊断测试。
队列研究(诊断);证据水平,2 级。
共有 50 名健康男性参与者(平均年龄,43.3 ± 11.9 岁),其胸大肌解剖结构正常且未受伤,所有参与者均在“肩部推举”起始位置(肩关节外展 90°,肩关节外旋 90°)拍摄数字照片。沿腋前褶测量同侧乳头和胸大肌肌曲率顶点之间的距离,称为胸大肌距离,双侧均进行测量。两名骨科医生在 2 个不同的时间点测量所有照片。胸大肌指数(PMI)的计算方法是胸大肌距离值的比值,以建立正常值。还计算了 19 名男性患者(平均年龄,33.8 ± 6.8 岁)的胸大肌破裂的 PMI,以评估这种新的可量化体格检查技术的诊断效用。
未受伤组的平均(±标准差)PMI 为 1.0 ± 0.07。PMI<0.9 的诊断阈值可使结构性显著胸大肌撕裂的敏感性为 79%、特异性为 98%、总准确性为 93%。PMI 与年龄或活动水平(包括参加运动和/或举重训练)之间没有相关性。PMI 技术具有良好到极好的内部可靠性(组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.82,0.74)和组间可靠性(ICC = 0.63,0.76)。
PMI 技术是一种简单、可量化且准确的结构性显著胸大肌撕裂的临床诊断测试。临床医生常规应用 PMI 技术可能会提高对结构性显著撕裂的准确识别,并促进转介给外科专家以获得最佳治疗和结果。