• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Average Daily Risk Range as a Measure of Glycemic Variability in Youths with Type 1 Diabetes.评估平均每日风险范围作为1型糖尿病青少年血糖变异性的一种衡量指标。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):795-800. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0061.
2
Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes.糖尿病患者血糖变异性新测量方法的评估
Diabetes Care. 2006 Nov;29(11):2433-8. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1085.
3
Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.高风险 1 型糖尿病成人应用连续血糖监测与间歇性扫描连续血糖监测比较的血糖变异性和低血糖事件。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 May;14(3):567-574. doi: 10.1177/1932296819867688. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
4
A comparison of average daily risk range scores for young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring data.使用连续血糖监测和自我监测数据比较 1 型糖尿病幼儿的平均日常风险范围评分。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Mar;14(3):239-43. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0169. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
5
Sensitivity of Traditional and Risk-Based Glycemic Variability Measures to the Effect of Glucose-Lowering Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.传统血糖变异性测量方法和基于风险的血糖变异性测量方法对2型糖尿病降糖治疗效果的敏感性
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jun 15;9(6):1227-35. doi: 10.1177/1932296815587014.
6
Measures of Risk and Glucose Variability in Adults Versus Youths.成人与青少年的风险及血糖变异性测量
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):766-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0276. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
7
Defining High Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes: Comparison of Multiple Indexes to Identify Patients at Risk of Hypoglycemia.定义 1 型糖尿病患者的高血糖变异性:比较多种指标以识别低血糖风险患者。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Aug;21(8):430-439. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0075. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
Accuracy and precision of glucose monitoring are relevant to treatment decision-making and clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with diabetes.血糖仪监测的准确性和精密度与住院糖尿病患者的治疗决策和临床结局相关。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Jul;13(7):723-30. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0035.
9
Long-Term Home Study on Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Alarms Using a New Fully Implantable Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Type 1 Diabetes.使用新型完全植入式连续血糖监测系统对1型糖尿病患者夜间低血糖警报进行的长期家庭研究
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):780-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0375. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
10
Evaluating quality of glycemic control: graphical displays of hypo- and hyperglycemia, time in target range, and mean glucose.评估血糖控制质量:低血糖和高血糖的图形展示、目标范围内时间以及平均血糖水平。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):56-62. doi: 10.1177/1932296814551046. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Activity, Glycemic Variability, and Parental Hypoglycemia Fear in Preschoolers With Type 1 Diabetes.1 型糖尿病学龄前儿童的体力活动、血糖变异性和父母对低血糖的恐惧。
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2022 Jan 19;34(3):135-140. doi: 10.1123/pes.2021-0046. Print 2022 Aug 1.
2
Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.高风险 1 型糖尿病成人应用连续血糖监测与间歇性扫描连续血糖监测比较的血糖变异性和低血糖事件。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 May;14(3):567-574. doi: 10.1177/1932296819867688. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
Shared Responsibility for Type 1 Diabetes Care Is Associated With Glycemic Variability and Risk of Glycemic Excursions in Youth.共同承担 1 型糖尿病的护理责任与青少年的血糖变异性和血糖波动风险相关。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Jan 1;43(1):61-71. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx081.
4
Measures of Risk and Glucose Variability in Adults Versus Youths.成人与青少年的风险及血糖变异性测量
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):766-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0276. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association.1型糖尿病的全生命周期:美国糖尿病协会的立场声明
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jul;37(7):2034-54. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1140.
2
Average Daily Risk Range (ADRR) in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病幼儿的平均每日风险范围(ADRR)
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jan;8(1):70-73. doi: 10.1177/1932296813511734. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
3
Average daily risk range as a measure for clinical research and routine care.作为临床研究和常规护理衡量指标的日均风险范围
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 1;7(5):1370-5. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700529.
4
Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society.低血糖与糖尿病:美国糖尿病协会和内分泌学会工作组报告。
Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1384-95. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2480. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
5
Association between glucose variability as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and diabetic retinopathy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.连续血糖监测(CGM)评估的血糖变异性与 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变的相关性。
Acta Diabetol. 2013 Jun;50(3):437-42. doi: 10.1007/s00592-013-0459-9. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
6
Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants.在 T1D 交换诊所注册参与者中,自我监测血糖频率与血红蛋白 A1c 水平之间存在很强关联的证据。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jul;36(7):2009-14. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1770. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
7
Impact of telemedicine assessment on glycemic variability in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.远程医疗评估对 1 型糖尿病患儿血糖变异性的影响。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb;15(2):136-42. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0243. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
8
The challenges of measuring glycemic variability.测量血糖变异性的挑战。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 May 1;6(3):712-5. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600328.
9
A comparison of average daily risk range scores for young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring data.使用连续血糖监测和自我监测数据比较 1 型糖尿病幼儿的平均日常风险范围评分。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Mar;14(3):239-43. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0169. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
10
Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes.糖尿病儿童及青少年低血糖的评估与管理
Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Sep;10 Suppl 12:134-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00583.x.

评估平均每日风险范围作为1型糖尿病青少年血糖变异性的一种衡量指标。

Evaluation of the Average Daily Risk Range as a Measure of Glycemic Variability in Youths with Type 1 Diabetes.

作者信息

Patton Susana R, DeLurgio Stephen A, Clements Mark A

机构信息

1 Division of Behavorial Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, Kansas.

2 Children's Mercy Hospital , Kansas City, Missouri.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):795-800. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0061.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2015.0061
PMID:26535929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4808279/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Average Daily Risk Range (ADRR) is a measure of glycemic variability (GV) developed for adults with diabetes. Although the ADRR is increasingly being reported in pediatric diabetes research and may also be used in clinical management, it has never been examined for its sensitivity to predicting hyper- and hypoglycemia in youths or compared for its predictive ability with other measures of GV in youths. Thus, we present predictive validity data for the ADRR in youths with type 1 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Glucometer data for 436 youths (mean age, 11.8±3.8 years) were collected from a clinical database. Using these data, we computed the ADRR, SD of blood glucose, coefficient of variation of blood glucose, Low Blood Glucose Index, High Blood Glucose Index, the percentage of glucose values ≥70 and ≤180 mg/dL, the percentage of high glucose values >180 mg/dL and >400 mg/dL, and the percentage of low glucose values <70 mg/dL and <40 mg/dL in Month 1. We then compared these with episodes of hypo- and hyperglycemia in Month 2.

RESULTS

The ADRR showed good concurrent validity with other measures of GV in youths experiencing hyperglycemic events but limited predictive validity in general and specifically with future hypoglycemic events. The percentages of current hyper- and hypoglycemic episodes appeared to be stronger predictors of future hyper- and hypoglycemic episodes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large pediatric sample, the ADRR was not the strongest predictor of future glycemic excursion. The percentages of current hyper- and hypoglycemic episodes appear to be stronger predictors.

摘要

目的

平均每日风险范围(ADRR)是一种为成年糖尿病患者开发的血糖变异性(GV)测量指标。尽管ADRR在儿科糖尿病研究中的报道越来越多,并且也可能用于临床管理,但从未对其预测青少年高血糖和低血糖的敏感性进行过研究,也未将其预测能力与青少年GV的其他测量指标进行比较。因此,我们展示了1型糖尿病青少年中ADRR的预测效度数据。

材料与方法

从临床数据库收集了436名青少年(平均年龄11.8±3.8岁)的血糖仪数据。利用这些数据,我们计算了第1个月的ADRR、血糖标准差、血糖变异系数、低血糖指数、高血糖指数、血糖值≥70和≤180mg/dL的百分比、高血糖值>180mg/dL和>400mg/dL的百分比以及低血糖值<70mg/dL和<40mg/dL的百分比。然后将这些数据与第2个月的低血糖和高血糖发作情况进行比较。

结果

在发生高血糖事件的青少年中,ADRR与其他GV测量指标显示出良好的同时效度,但总体预测效度有限,尤其是对未来低血糖事件的预测效度。当前高血糖和低血糖发作的百分比似乎分别是未来高血糖和低血糖发作的更强预测指标。

结论

在一个大型儿科样本中,ADRR并非未来血糖波动的最强预测指标。当前高血糖和低血糖发作的百分比似乎是更强的预测指标。