• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者血糖变异性新测量方法的评估

Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes.

作者信息

Kovatchev Boris P, Otto Erik, Cox Daniel, Gonder-Frederick Linda, Clarke William

机构信息

University of Virginia Health System, Box 800137, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2006 Nov;29(11):2433-8. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1085.

DOI:10.2337/dc06-1085
PMID:17065680
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies show the importance of controlling blood glucose variability in relationship to both reducing hypoglycemia and attenuating the risk for cardiovascular and behavioral complications due to hyperglycemia. It is therefore important to design variability measures that are equally predictive of low and high blood glucose excursions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We introduce the average daily risk range (ADRR), a variability measure computed from routine self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) data. The ADRR was constructed using a development dataset for 39 and 31 adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The formula was then fixed, and the ADRR was compared against other variability measures using an independent validation dataset containing approximately 4 months of SMBG for 254 and 81 adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

From the 1st month of validation SMBG data, we computed the ADRR, blood glucose SD and coefficient of variation, daily blood glucose range and interquartile range, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion, M-value, and lability index. Then all measures were tested as predictors of low blood glucose (<2.2 mmol/l; <3.9 mmol/l) and high (>10 mmol/l; >22.2 mmol/l) events in the subsequent 3 months. The ADRR was the best predictor of both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, with a 6-fold increase in the likelihood of hypoglycemia and 3.5-fold increase in the likelihood of hyperglycemia across its risk categories.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large SMBG database, the ADRR showed strong association with subsequent out-of-control glucose readings. Compared with other variability measures, the ADRR demonstrated a superior balance of sensitivity to predicting both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. This prediction was independent from type of diabetes.

摘要

目的

近期研究表明,控制血糖变异性对于降低低血糖风险以及减轻高血糖所致心血管和行为并发症风险均具有重要意义。因此,设计出能够同样有效预测低血糖和高血糖波动的变异性测量指标至关重要。

研究设计与方法

我们引入了平均每日风险范围(ADRR),这是一种根据常规自我监测血糖(SMBG)数据计算得出的变异性测量指标。ADRR是利用分别包含39名1型糖尿病成人和31名2型糖尿病成人的一个开发数据集构建而成的。随后固定该公式,并使用一个独立验证数据集将ADRR与其他变异性测量指标进行比较,该验证数据集包含254名1型糖尿病成人和81名2型糖尿病成人约4个月的SMBG数据。

结果

从验证SMBG数据的第1个月起,我们计算了ADRR、血糖标准差和变异系数、每日血糖范围和四分位间距、血糖波动平均幅度、M值以及不稳定指数。然后将所有测量指标作为随后3个月内低血糖(<2.2 mmol/l;<3.9 mmol/l)和高血糖(>10 mmol/l;>22.2 mmol/l)事件的预测指标进行测试。ADRR是低血糖和高血糖的最佳预测指标,在其各个风险类别中,低血糖发生可能性增加了6倍,高血糖发生可能性增加了3.5倍。

结论

在一个大型SMBG数据库中,ADRR与随后的血糖失控读数显示出强烈关联。与其他变异性测量指标相比,ADRR在预测低血糖和高血糖方面表现出更优的敏感性平衡。这种预测与糖尿病类型无关。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes.糖尿病患者血糖变异性新测量方法的评估
Diabetes Care. 2006 Nov;29(11):2433-8. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1085.
2
Relationships between glucose variability and conventional measures of glycemic control in continuously monitored patients with type 2 diabetes.持续监测的2型糖尿病患者血糖变异性与传统血糖控制指标之间的关系。
Horm Metab Res. 2009 Feb;41(2):137-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1128143. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
3
Evaluation of the Average Daily Risk Range as a Measure of Glycemic Variability in Youths with Type 1 Diabetes.评估平均每日风险范围作为1型糖尿病青少年血糖变异性的一种衡量指标。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):795-800. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0061.
4
A comparison of average daily risk range scores for young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring data.使用连续血糖监测和自我监测数据比较 1 型糖尿病幼儿的平均日常风险范围评分。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Mar;14(3):239-43. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0169. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
5
Is the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose related to long-term metabolic control? Multicenter analysis including 24,500 patients from 191 centers in Germany and Austria.血糖自我监测频率与长期代谢控制有关吗?对来自德国和奥地利191个中心的24500名患者进行的多中心分析。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006 Jul;114(7):384-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924152.
6
Detection of hypoglycemia by children with type 1 diabetes 6 to 11 years of age and their parents: a field study.6至11岁1型糖尿病患儿及其父母对低血糖的检测:一项现场研究。
Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):e489-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0808.
7
Is self-monitoring of blood glucose appropriate for all type 2 diabetic patients? The Fremantle Diabetes Study.血糖自我监测适用于所有2型糖尿病患者吗?弗里曼特尔糖尿病研究。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1764-70. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0268.
8
A probabilistic model for predicting hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Diabetes Outcomes in Veterans Study (DOVES).一种预测2型糖尿病低血糖的概率模型:退伍军人糖尿病结局研究(DOVES)。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jul 12;164(13):1445-50. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.13.1445.
9
Factors affecting hypoglycemia awareness in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: The Diabetes Outcomes in Veterans Study (DOVES).胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者低血糖意识的影响因素:退伍军人糖尿病结局研究(DOVES)
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004 Jul;65(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2003.11.013.
10
[How to measure glycemic instability?].[如何测量血糖不稳定性?]
Diabetes Metab. 2000 Apr;26(2):148-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation Between Blood Glucose Variability Indices Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Gestational Diabetes Patients and Abnormal Glucose Levels 42 Days Postpartum.妊娠期糖尿病患者连续血糖监测的血糖变异性指标与产后42天血糖异常之间的相关性
J Diabetes Res. 2025 Jul 14;2025:1021066. doi: 10.1155/jdr/1021066. eCollection 2025.
2
Identification of gut microbiome features associated with host metabolic health in a large population-based cohort.在一个大型基于人群的队列中,鉴定与宿主代谢健康相关的肠道微生物组特征。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 29;15(1):9358. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53832-y.
3
Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients Receiving a Diabetes-Specific Nutritional Enteral Formula: A Case Series in Home Care Settings.
糖尿病患者接受糖尿病专用肠内营养配方的血糖控制:家庭护理环境中的病例系列。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 7;16(16):2602. doi: 10.3390/nu16162602.
4
Clinical relevance of short-term glycemic variability in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a narrative review.1型糖尿病儿童和青少年短期血糖变异性的临床相关性:一项叙述性综述。
Transl Pediatr. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):1231-1241. doi: 10.21037/tp-24-114. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
5
Association of scan frequency with CGM-derived metrics and influential factors in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.扫描频率与1型糖尿病成年患者的连续血糖监测衍生指标及影响因素的关联
Diabetol Int. 2023 Sep 12;15(1):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s13340-023-00655-9. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
How to Measure Glycemic Variability? A Literature Review.如何衡量血糖变异性?文献综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 28;60(1):61. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010061.
7
Statistical Packages and Algorithms for the Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data: A Systematic Review.用于分析连续血糖监测数据的统计软件包和算法:一项系统评价。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 May;19(3):787-809. doi: 10.1177/19322968231221803. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
The inverse association between DNA gaps and HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus.2 型糖尿病中 DNA 缺口与 HbA1c 水平呈负相关。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 3;13(1):18987. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46431-2.
9
A systematic bibliometric analysis on the clinical practice of CGM in diabetes mellitus from 2012 to 2022.2012 年至 2022 年糖尿病患者连续血糖监测的临床实践的系统文献计量分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 22;14:1229494. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1229494. eCollection 2023.
10
Exploring the risk of glycemic variability in non-diabetic depressive individuals: a cross-sectional GlyDep pilot study.探索非糖尿病抑郁个体血糖变异性的风险:一项横断面GlyDep试点研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 15;14:1196866. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1196866. eCollection 2023.