Suppr超能文献

口服 13 小时住院皮质类固醇预防对比增强 CT 前的间接成本和危害归因。

Indirect Cost and Harm Attributable to Oral 13-Hour Inpatient Corticosteroid Prophylaxis before Contrast-enhanced CT.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology (M.S.D., B.M.M., .H.E., J.R.D., N.R.D., R.H.C.), Division of Abdominal Imaging (M.S.D., J.H.E., N.R.D., R.H.C.); Section of Pediatric Imaging (J.R.D.), and Michigan Radiology Quality Collaborative (M.S.D.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48108.

出版信息

Radiology. 2016 May;279(2):492-501. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151143. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the effect of an oral 13-hour inpatient corticosteroid premedication regimen on length of stay, hospital cost, and hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) by using a combination of real and hypothetical study populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Inpatients who received an oral 13-hour corticosteroid premedication regimen before contrast material-enhanced CT (n = 1424) from 2008 to 2013 were matched by age, sex, and year when CT was performed to a control cohort (n = 1425) of patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT without premedication and who had similar rates of 13 comorbid diseases. Length of stay in the hospital and time from admission to CT were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Rates of prospectively reported HAIs were compared by using χ(2) tests. The indirect cost and risk of HAI with premedication were estimated by using published data.

RESULTS

Premedicated inpatients had a significantly longer median length of stay (+25 hours; 158 vs 133 hours, P < .001), a significantly longer median time to CT (+25 hours, 42 vs 17 hours, respectively; P < .001), and a significantly greater risk of HAI (5.1% [72 of 1424] vs 3.1% [44 of 1424], respectively; P = .008) compared with nonpremedicated control subjects. On the basis of these data and existing references, the prolonged length of stay was estimated to result in 0.04 HAI-related deaths and a cost of $159 131 (in U.S. dollars) for each prevented reaction of any severity and 32 HAI-related deaths and a cost of $131 211 400 for each prevented reaction-related death.

CONCLUSION

Oral 13-hour inpatient corticosteroid prophylaxis is associated with substantial cost relative to its modest benefit, and may cause more indirect harm than the direct harm that it prevents.

摘要

目的

通过真实和假设的研究人群组合,估计口服 13 小时住院皮质激素预治疗方案对住院时间、医院费用和医院获得性感染(HAI)的影响。

材料和方法

这项符合 HIPAA 规定的回顾性研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并豁免了知情同意。2008 年至 2013 年间,接受口服 13 小时皮质激素预治疗方案的增强 CT 对比剂前的住院患者(n = 1424)按年龄、性别和 CT 检查年份与未接受预治疗的接受增强 CT 对比剂的对照组患者(n = 1425)相匹配,这些患者具有 13 种相似的合并症。通过 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较住院时间和从入院到 CT 的时间。通过 χ(2)检验比较前瞻性报告的 HAI 发生率。通过使用已发表的数据来估计皮质激素预治疗的间接成本和 HAI 风险。

结果

预治疗住院患者的中位住院时间显著延长(+25 小时;158 与 133 小时,P <.001),中位 CT 时间显著延长(+25 小时;42 与 17 小时,分别;P <.001),并且 HAI 的风险显著增加(5.1%[72 例/1424 例]与 3.1%[44 例/1424 例],分别;P =.008)与未接受预治疗的对照组相比。基于这些数据和现有参考文献,延长住院时间估计会导致每预防任何严重程度的反应造成 0.04 例 HAI 相关死亡和 159131 美元(美元)的费用,以及每预防 1 例反应相关死亡造成 32 例 HAI 相关死亡和 131211400 美元的费用。

结论

口服 13 小时住院皮质激素预防与适度益处相比,费用相当大,并且可能造成比它预防的直接危害更大的间接危害。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验