Suppr超能文献

[杂交血管重建术治疗多节段下肢动脉疾病——单中心经验分析]

[The use of hybrid revascularization procedures for the therapy of multilevel lower extremity arterial disease--analysis of single center experience].

作者信息

Biroš E, Staffa R, Vlachovský R, Trnová-Chudárková M, Vojtíšek B, Suškevič I, Janoušová E

出版信息

Rozhl Chir. 2015 Sep;94(9):372-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The goal of this study was to evaluate our experience and results of single staged hybrid procedures for revascularization of lower extremities affected by multilevel arterial occlusive disease. We analysed the effect of the indication and type of reconstruction on patency.

METHOD

Patients were retrospectively reviewed. Data collection was conducted prospectively. Patients were divided into 5 groups based on the type of hybrid reconstruction. Group "1" included patients who underwent transluminal angioplasty (TA)±stenting of iliac arteries with endarterectomy (EA) and patch arterioplasty of the femoral bifurcation (35 patients; 27.6 %). Group "2" included patients who underwent TA±stenting of iliac arteries with infrainguinal bypass (15 patients; 11.8 %). Group "3" consisted of patients who underwent TA±stenting of outflow lower extremity arteries: superficial femoral artery±popliteal artery±crural arteries in combination with EA and patch arterioplasty of the femoral bifurcation (52 patients; 40.9 %). Group "4" represented patients who underwent infrainguinal bypass surgery in combination with TA distal to the site of open reconstruction (3 patients; 2.4%). Group "5" represented a heterogenous population of patients who underwent a hybrid reconstruction which did not belong to any of the 4 previously mentioned groups (22 patients; 17.3 %). The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the indication criteria of the intervention: Patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI) were put into group "ALI". Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) were put into group "CLI". Patients with claudications were put into group "II". Patency analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier life tables. Differences in patency rates between the different groups of patients were determined using the log-rank test. Statistical analysis was performed using the software IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0.

RESULTS

The study included 127 patients who underwent 127 hybrid arterial procedures. Technical and clinical success rates were 96.9% and 98.4%. 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 3.1%. The primary (PP), assisted-primary (APP) and secondary patency (SP) results at 2 years were the best amongst the patients from groups "1" and "3". These patients underwent patch arterioplasty±EA of the femoral bifurcation in combination with transluminal angioplasty of inflow or outflow arteries of the lower extremity. The resulting PP, APP and SP rates at 2 years in group "1" were 80.6%, 84.3% and 84.3%. Patency rates in group "3" in the same order at 2 years were 81.1 %, 82.8% and 86.3%. Significantly lower patency rates were achieved in patients from groups "2" and "5". The resulting PP, APP and SP rates in group "2" at 2 years were 39.4%, 59.1% and 59.1%; in group "5" at 2 years they were 30.4%, 49.2% and 70.7%. Taking into account the effect of the indication on patency rates, we found that patients from group "CLI" had the best APP and SP rates at 2 years: 81.6% and 86.2%. Only the PP rate at 2 years was the best in group "II" (patients with claudications): 71.1%. Patients who underwent their operations because of acute limb ischemia (group "ALI") achieved the worst results among these 3 groups. Their PP, APP and SP rates at 2 years were 33.7%, 46.2% and 45.5%. Patients from the group "CLI" had the best amputation-free survival at 2 years: 89.1% amongst the 3 groups subdivided according to the indication for the intervention ("II" 81.9%; "ALI" 61.4%). Overall survival and amputation-free survival at 2 years were 93.2% and 82.3%, respectively, for the whole studied population.

CONCLUSION

The hybrid procedure is an intervention which combines endovascular and open reconstruction performed at the same time. Hybrid procedures provide effective therapy for patients with multilevel lower extremity arterial disease. They have low complication rates, periprocedural morbidity and mortality. Using these procedures, we are able to achieve good limb salvage rates and patency rates irrespective of the form of chronic limb ischemia (claudications, critical limb ischemia). Results for patients with acute limb ischemia are inferior. The combination of patch arterioplasty±endarterectomy of the femoral bifurcation with transluminal angioplasty of inflow or outflow limb arteries is our hybrid procedure of choice with the most favourable results.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是评估我们对受多节段动脉闭塞性疾病影响的下肢进行单阶段杂交手术血运重建的经验和结果。我们分析了重建指征和类型对通畅率的影响。

方法

对患者进行回顾性研究。前瞻性收集数据。根据杂交重建类型将患者分为5组。“1”组包括接受经皮腔内血管成形术(TA)±髂动脉支架置入术,同时行内膜切除术(EA)和股动脉分叉处补片动脉成形术的患者(35例;27.6%)。“2”组包括接受TA±髂动脉支架置入术并联合腹股沟下旁路移植术的患者(15例;11.8%)。“3”组由接受下肢流出道动脉TA±支架置入术的患者组成:股浅动脉±腘动脉±小腿动脉,同时联合EA和股动脉分叉处补片动脉成形术(52例;40.9%)。“4”组代表接受腹股沟下旁路手术并在开放重建部位远端联合TA的患者(3例;2.4%)。“5”组代表接受不属于上述4组中任何一组的杂交重建的异质性患者群体(22例;17.3%)。根据干预指征标准将患者分为3组:急性肢体缺血(ALI)患者归入“ALI”组。严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者归入“CLI”组。间歇性跛行患者归入“II”组。使用Kaplan-Meier生存表进行通畅性分析。使用对数秩检验确定不同患者组之间通畅率的差异。使用IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0软件进行统计分析。

结果

本研究纳入127例接受127例杂交动脉手术的患者。技术成功率和临床成功率分别为96.9%和98.4%。30天围手术期死亡率为3.1%。“1”组和“3”组患者2年时的主要通畅率(PP)、辅助主要通畅率(APP)和次要通畅率(SP)结果最佳。这些患者接受了股动脉分叉处补片动脉成形术±EA,同时联合下肢流入或流出动脉的经皮腔内血管成形术。“1”组2年时的PP、APP和SP率分别为80.6%、84.3%和84.3%。“3”组2年时的通畅率按相同顺序分别为81.1%、82.8%和86.3%。“2”组和“5”组患者的通畅率显著较低。“2”组2年时的PP、APP和SP率分别为39.4%、59.1%和59.1%;“5”组2年时分别为30.4%、49.2%和70.7%。考虑到指征对通畅率的影响,我们发现“CLI”组患者2年时的APP和SP率最佳:分别为81.6%和86.2%。仅2年时的PP率在“II”组(间歇性跛行患者)中最佳:为71.1%。因急性肢体缺血接受手术的患者(“ALI”组)在这3组中结果最差。他们2年时的PP、APP和SP率分别为33.7%、46.2%和45.5%。“CLI”组患者2年时的无截肢生存率最佳:在根据干预指征细分的3组中为89.1%(“II”组为81.9%;“ALI”组为61.4%)。整个研究人群2年时的总生存率和无截肢生存率分别为93.2%和82.3%。

结论

杂交手术是一种同时结合血管内和开放重建的干预措施。杂交手术为多节段下肢动脉疾病患者提供了有效的治疗方法。它们具有低并发症率、围手术期发病率和死亡率。使用这些手术,无论慢性肢体缺血的形式(间歇性跛行、严重肢体缺血)如何,我们都能够获得良好的肢体挽救率和通畅率。急性肢体缺血患者的结果较差。股动脉分叉处补片动脉成形术±内膜切除术与下肢流入或流出动脉经皮腔内血管成形术的联合是我们首选的杂交手术,效果最理想。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验