Kim Ji Young, Lee Joon Woo, Lee Geun Young, Lee Eugene, Yoon Chang Jin, Kang Heung Sik
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, South Korea.
Skeletal Radiol. 2016 Feb;45(2):169-76. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2277-3. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
To perform an intra-individual comparison for the effectiveness of lumbar epidural steroid injection (ESI) between injections using particulate (triamcinolone) and non-particulate (dexamethasone) steroid.
This study included 162 patients(M:F = 60:102, mean age 66.3 years) who underwent lumbar ESI using dexamethasone(ESI_DEXA) from April 2013 to May 2013 and who had previously underwent lumbar ESI using triamcinolone(ESI_TRIAM) within 1 year. Degree of relative satisfaction, injection-free interval and injection frequency were determined. Subgroup analyses were also done according to the diagnosis, approach-methods, patients' ages and sex.
Eighty-seven of 139 patients (62.6 %) responded that the effect of ESI_TRIAM was better than that of ESI_DEXA (p = 0.004). In the four subgroups-patients with herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD), who underwent transforaminal ESI, were under age 70 and were male patients-the proportion of patients who preferred ESI_TRIAM was significantly greater than the proportion patients who preferred ESI_DEXA in terms of relative satisfaction (p < 0.05). The injection-free interval of ESI_TRIAM was significantly longer than that of ESI_DEXA (p = 0.01). In the subgroup analyses, the patient groups HIVD, who underwent transforaminal ESI, under age 70 and female patients with longer injection-free interval of ESI_TRIAM than ESI_DEXA were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Other factors were not significant.
The relative satisfaction with ESI_TRIAM was significantly better than that with ESI_DEXA in the same patient, and the injection-free interval after ESI_TRIAM was significantly longer than that after ESI_DEXA.
对使用颗粒状(曲安奈德)和非颗粒状(地塞米松)类固醇进行腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)的有效性进行个体内比较。
本研究纳入了162例患者(男∶女 = 60∶102,平均年龄66.3岁),这些患者在2013年4月至2013年5月接受了使用地塞米松的腰椎ESI(ESI_DEXA),且在1年内曾接受过使用曲安奈德的腰椎ESI(ESI_TRIAM)。确定相对满意度、无注射间隔时间和注射频率。还根据诊断、进针方法、患者年龄和性别进行了亚组分析。
139例患者中有87例(62.6%)回答ESI_TRIAM的效果优于ESI_DEXA(p = 0.004)。在四个亚组中,即患有椎间盘突出症(HIVD)、接受经椎间孔ESI、年龄在70岁以下以及男性患者中,在相对满意度方面,更喜欢ESI_TRIAM的患者比例显著高于更喜欢ESI_DEXA的患者比例(p < 0.05)。ESI_TRIAM的无注射间隔时间显著长于ESI_DEXA(p = 0.01)。在亚组分析中,患有HIVD、接受经椎间孔ESI、年龄在70岁以下以及ESI_TRIAM的无注射间隔时间比ESI_DEXA长的女性患者组具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。其他因素无统计学意义。
同一患者对ESI_TRIAM的相对满意度显著优于ESI_DEXA,且ESI_TRIAM后的无注射间隔时间显著长于ESI_DEXA后的无注射间隔时间。