Suppr超能文献

一种从动态(99m)锝-巯基乙酰三甘氨酸闪烁扫描数据确定分肾功能的简单方法。

A simple method for determining split renal function from dynamic (99m)Tc-MAG3 scintigraphic data.

作者信息

Wesolowski Michal J, Conrad Gary R, Šámal Martin, Watson Gage, Wanasundara Surajith N, Babyn Paul, Wesolowski Carl A

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 0W8.

Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Mar;43(3):550-8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3216-1. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Commonly used methods for determining split renal function (SRF) from dynamic scintigraphic data require extrarenal background subtraction and additional correction for intrarenal vascular activity. The use of these additional regions of interest (ROIs) can produce inaccurate results and be challenging, e.g. if the heart is out of the camera field of view. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new method for determining SRF called the blood pool compensation (BPC) technique, which is simple to implement, does not require extrarenal background correction and intrinsically corrects for intrarenal vascular activity.

METHODS

In the BPC method SRF is derived from a parametric plot of the curves generated by one blood-pool and two renal ROIs. Data from 107 patients who underwent (99m)Tc-MAG3 scintigraphy were used to determine SRF values. Values calculated using the BPC method were compared to those obtained with the integral (IN) and Patlak-Rutland (PR) techniques using Bland-Altman plotting and Passing-Bablok regression. The interobserver variability of the BPC technique was also assessed for two observers.

RESULTS

The SRF values obtained with the BPC method did not differ significantly from those obtained with the PR method and showed no consistent bias, while SRF values obtained with the IN method showed significant differences with some bias in comparison to those obtained with either the PR or BPC method. No significant interobserver variability was found between two observers calculating SRF using the BPC method.

CONCLUSION

The BPC method requires only three ROIs to produce reliable estimates of SRF, was simple to implement, and in this study yielded statistically equivalent results to the PR method with appreciable interobserver agreement. As such, it adds a new reliable method for quality control of monitoring relative kidney function.

摘要

目的

从动态闪烁扫描数据中确定分肾功能(SRF)的常用方法需要进行肾外本底扣除以及对肾内血管活性进行额外校正。使用这些额外的感兴趣区域(ROI)可能会产生不准确的结果且具有挑战性,例如当心脏不在相机视野范围内时。本研究的目的是评估一种确定SRF的新方法,即血池补偿(BPC)技术,该技术易于实施,不需要肾外本底校正,并且能内在地校正肾内血管活性。

方法

在BPC方法中,SRF是从一个血池和两个肾脏ROI生成的曲线的参数图中得出的。来自107例接受(99m)Tc - MAG3闪烁扫描的患者的数据用于确定SRF值。使用Bland - Altman绘图和Passing - Bablok回归将使用BPC方法计算的值与通过积分(IN)和Patlak - Rutland(PR)技术获得的值进行比较。还评估了两名观察者对BPC技术的观察者间变异性。

结果

用BPC方法获得的SRF值与用PR方法获得的值无显著差异,且未显示出一致的偏差,而与用PR或BPC方法获得的值相比,用IN方法获得的SRF值显示出显著差异并有一定偏差。在两名使用BPC方法计算SRF的观察者之间未发现显著的观察者间变异性。

结论

BPC方法仅需要三个ROI就能产生可靠的SRF估计值,易于实施,并且在本研究中产生的统计结果与PR方法相当,观察者间一致性良好。因此,它为监测相对肾功能的质量控制增加了一种新的可靠方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验