Fleming J S, Kemp P M
Department of Medical Physics, Southampton University Hospitals, NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
J Nucl Med. 1999 Sep;40(9):1503-7.
Deconvolution and the Patlak-Rutland plot are two of the most commonly used methods for analyzing dynamic radionuclide renography. Both methods allow estimation of absolute and relative renal uptake of radiopharmaceutical and of its rate of transit through the kidney.
A theoretical comparison of uptake assessment by both techniques is made and a mathematical derivation of the relationship between mean transit time (MTT) and renal outflow efficiency (ROE) is presented. The validity of these theoretical findings was tested in a series of 120 renograms obtained using 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3).
The estimates of renal uptake obtained are theoretically equivalent. The renogram measurements confirmed this, because there was no significant systematic difference in relative counts obtained by the two methods. Absolute counts were significantly higher for the deconvolution measurements, but only by 2.0%. The SDs of the differences between the two techniques, expressed as a percentage of the mean, were 1.7% and 5.4% for relative and absolute counts, respectively. There was an inverse monotonic relationship between MTT and ROE. ROE evaluated at a particular time was shown to depend on absolute renal function. Measured values of MTT and ROE were consistent with the theoretical prediction.
The two approaches to renogram analysis provide consistent parameters for both uptake and transit evaluation.
反卷积法和Patlak-Rutland图是分析动态放射性核素肾图最常用的两种方法。这两种方法都可以估计放射性药物在肾脏的绝对摄取量和相对摄取量及其在肾脏中的通过速率。
对两种技术的摄取评估进行了理论比较,并给出了平均通过时间(MTT)与肾流出效率(ROE)之间关系的数学推导。在使用99mTc-巯基乙酰三甘氨酸(MAG3)获得的一系列120张肾图中对这些理论发现的有效性进行了测试。
理论上,所获得的肾脏摄取估计值是等效的。肾图测量结果证实了这一点,因为两种方法获得的相对计数没有显著的系统差异。反卷积测量的绝对计数显著更高,但仅高2.0%。两种技术之间差异的标准差,以平均值的百分比表示,相对计数和绝对计数分别为1.7%和5.4%。MTT与ROE之间存在反单调关系。在特定时间评估的ROE显示取决于绝对肾功能。MTT和ROE的测量值与理论预测一致。
肾图分析的两种方法为摄取和通过评估提供了一致的参数。