Ahn Jae-Sook, Kim Jae-Young, Kim Hyeoung-Joon, Kim Yeo-Kyeoung, Lee Seung-Shin, Jung Sung-Hoon, Yang Deok-Hwan, Lee Je-Jung, Kim Nan Young, Choi Seung Hyun, Minden Mark D, Jung Chul Won, Jang Jun-Ho, Kim Hee Je, Moon Joon Ho, Sohn Sang Kyun, Won Jong-Ho, Kim Sung-Hyun, Kim Dennis Dong Hwan
Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 322 Seoyangro, Hwasun, Jeollanamdo, 519-763, Republic of Korea.
Genomic Research Center for Hematopoietic Diseases, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea.
Ann Hematol. 2016 Jan;95(2):301-10. doi: 10.1007/s00277-015-2540-7. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
Normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia (NK-AML) with CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (CEBPA) mutations is known to have a more favorable prognosis. However, direct comparison of the clinical significance according to consolidation therapy has not been widely performed in patients with NK-AML. A total of 404 patients with NK-AML who received intensive induction chemotherapy were included in the present study. Diagnostic samples from the patients were evaluated for CEBPA mutations by direct sequencing. CEBPA single (sm) or double mutation (dm) was observed in 27 (6.7 %) and 51 (12.6 %) patients, respectively. CEBPA (dm) was associated with GATA2 (mut), and it was less frequently associated with FLT3-ITD(pos), NPM1 (mut), and DNMT3A (mut) in comparison with CEBPA (wild) or CEBPA (sm) (all p values <0.05). On multivariate analysis, CEBPA (dm) (p = 0.007, OR 39.593) was an independent risk factor for achievement of complete remission (CR). With a median follow-up of 40.1 months, CEBPA (dm) showed a favorable overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and lower relapse incidence (RI) in comparison with CEBPA (wild) (all p values <0.005). Comparison of clinical outcome analyses (consolidation chemotherapy vs. allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)) demonstrated the role of consolidation treatment in patients with CEBPA (dm). Allogeneic HCT was associated with lower EFS and RI and a trend of higher non-relapse mortality. However, there was no statistically significant difference in OS. In conclusion, CEBPA (dm) was associated with other molecular mutations. Consolidation chemotherapy alone may overcome higher relapse rates by reducing the treatment mortality and increasing survival after relapse events in patients with CEBPA (dm) in NK-AML.
已知伴有CCAAT/增强子结合蛋白α(CEBPA)突变的核型正常急性髓系白血病(NK-AML)预后较好。然而,对于NK-AML患者,尚未广泛开展根据巩固治疗进行临床意义的直接比较。本研究共纳入404例接受强化诱导化疗的NK-AML患者。通过直接测序对患者的诊断样本进行CEBPA突变评估。分别在27例(6.7%)和51例(12.6%)患者中观察到CEBPA单突变(sm)或双突变(dm)。与CEBPA(野生型)或CEBPA(sm)相比,CEBPA(dm)与GATA2(突变型)相关,且与FLT3-ITD(阳性)、NPM1(突变型)和DNMT3A(突变型)的关联频率较低(所有p值<0.05)。多因素分析显示,CEBPA(dm)(p = 0.007,OR 39.593)是实现完全缓解(CR)的独立危险因素。中位随访40.1个月,与CEBPA(野生型)相比,CEBPA(dm)显示出良好的总生存期(OS)、无事件生存期(EFS)和较低的复发率(RI)(所有p值<0.005)。临床结局分析(巩固化疗与异基因造血细胞移植(HCT))的比较显示了巩固治疗在CEBPA(dm)患者中的作用。异基因HCT与较低的EFS和RI以及较高的非复发死亡率趋势相关。然而,OS无统计学显著差异。总之,CEBPA(dm)与其他分子突变相关。单纯巩固化疗可能通过降低治疗死亡率和提高NK-AML中CEBPA(dm)患者复发事件后的生存率来克服较高的复发率。