Vendl Catharina, Clauss Marcus, Stewart Mathew, Leggett Keith, Hummel Jürgen, Kreuzer Michael, Munn Adam
Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland Centre for Sustainable Ecosystems Solutions, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Exp Biol. 2015 Nov;218(Pt 21):3425-34. doi: 10.1242/jeb.128165.
Fundamental differences in methane (CH4) production between macropods (kangaroos) and ruminants have been suggested and linked to differences in the composition of the forestomach microbiome. Using six western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) and four red kangaroos (Macropus rufus), we measured daily absolute CH4 production in vivo as well as CH4 yield (CH4 per unit of intake of dry matter, gross energy or digestible fibre) by open-circuit respirometry. Two food intake levels were tested using a chopped lucerne hay (alfalfa) diet. Body mass-specific absolute CH4 production resembled values previously reported in wallabies and non-ruminant herbivores such as horses, and did not differ with food intake level, although there was no concomitant proportionate decrease in fibre digestibility with higher food intake. In contrast, CH4 yield decreased with increasing intake, and was intermediate between values reported for ruminants and non-ruminant herbivores. These results correspond to those in ruminants and other non-ruminant species where increased intake (and hence a shorter digesta retention in the gut) leads to a lower CH4 yield. We hypothesize that rather than harbouring a fundamentally different microbiome in their foregut, the microbiome of macropods is in a particular metabolic state more tuned towards growth (i.e. biomass production) rather than CH4 production. This is due to the short digesta retention time in macropods and the known distinct 'digesta washing' in the gut of macropods, where fluids move faster than particles and hence most likely wash out microbes from the forestomach. Although our data suggest that kangaroos only produce about 27% of the body mass-specific volume of CH4 of ruminants, it remains to be modelled with species-specific growth rates and production conditions whether or not significantly lower CH4 amounts are emitted per kg of meat in kangaroo than in beef or mutton production.
有人提出,大袋鼠(袋鼠)和反刍动物在甲烷(CH4)产生方面存在根本差异,并与前胃微生物群的组成差异有关。我们使用6只西部灰袋鼠(褐大袋鼠)和4只红袋鼠(赤大袋鼠),通过开路呼吸测定法测量了每日体内绝对CH4产量以及CH4产量(每单位干物质摄入量、总能或可消化纤维的CH4量)。使用切碎的苜蓿干草日粮测试了两种食物摄入量水平。按体重计算的绝对CH4产量与先前在小袋鼠和非反刍食草动物(如马)中报道的值相似,并且与食物摄入量水平无关,尽管随着食物摄入量增加,纤维消化率并没有相应成比例下降。相比之下,CH4产量随着摄入量增加而降低,并且介于反刍动物和非反刍食草动物报道的值之间。这些结果与反刍动物和其他非反刍物种的结果一致,即摄入量增加(从而肠道内食糜停留时间缩短)会导致CH4产量降低。我们推测,大袋鼠前胃中的微生物群并非具有根本不同的微生物群,而是处于一种更倾向于生长(即生物量生产)而非CH4产生的特定代谢状态。这是由于大袋鼠的食糜停留时间较短,以及大袋鼠肠道中已知的独特“食糜冲洗”现象,即液体比颗粒移动得更快,因此很可能将微生物从前胃中冲洗出来。尽管我们的数据表明,袋鼠产生的按体重计算的CH4量仅为反刍动物的约27%,但仍有待根据物种特定的生长速率和生产条件进行建模,以确定袋鼠每千克肉排放的CH4量是否显著低于牛肉或羊肉生产中的排放量。