Sayeed Khaleel, Murdakes Charlene, Spec Andrej, Gashti Casey
Section of Nephrology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Semin Dial. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):81-4. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12449. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
In patients who receive hemodialysis, most hypersensitivity reactions to components of the dialysis circuit are due to ethylene oxide or complement activating bio-incompatible membranes. We present a case of a 59 year-old female, with a 4-year history of uneventful hemodialysis using a cellulose based dialyzer membrane at her outpatient dialysis center, who developed repeated anaphylactic reactions associated with markers of an IgE mediated hypersensitivity reaction when a polysulfone based dialyzer membrane was used while she was hospitalized. Only when the patient's dialyzer was changed back to her usual cellulose based membrane, did these reactions cease. On the basis of her clinical course and laboratory findings, we concluded that the patient's symptoms were due to exposure to polysulfone. This case reminds us that "biocompatible" membranes are not free from dialyzer reactions, and can be especially severe if the mechanism is an IgE mediated anaphylactic hypersensitivity reaction.
在接受血液透析的患者中,对透析回路组件的大多数超敏反应是由环氧乙烷或补体激活生物不相容膜引起的。我们报告一例59岁女性患者,她在门诊透析中心使用纤维素基透析器膜进行了4年的平稳血液透析,住院期间使用聚砜基透析器膜时出现了与IgE介导的超敏反应标志物相关的反复过敏反应。只有当患者的透析器换回她常用的纤维素基膜时,这些反应才停止。根据她的临床病程和实验室检查结果,我们得出结论,患者的症状是由于接触聚砜所致。这个病例提醒我们,“生物相容性”膜并非不会发生透析器反应,如果其机制是IgE介导的过敏性超敏反应,反应可能会特别严重。