Cerezo-Manchado Juan Jose, Roldán Vanessa, Corral Javier, Rosafalco Mario, Antón Ana Isabel, Padilla Jose, Vicente Vicente, González-Conejero Rocio
Vanessa Roldán, Sº Hematologia y Oncologia Medica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Avda. Marqués de los Vélez s/n, 30008 Murcia, Spain, Tel./Fax: +34 968360969, E-mail:
Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jan;115(1):117-25. doi: 10.1160/TH14-09-0814. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
A few trials so far have evaluated the effectiveness of algorithms designed to calculate doses in oral anticoagulant therapy, with negative or contradictory results. We compared a genotype-guided algorithm vs physician management for the initiation of acenocoumarol. In a two-arm, prospective, randomised study with patients with atrial fibrillation who started therapy, the first dose was administered to all patients according to the physician's criteria. At 72 hours, the corresponding dose was calculated based on INR in the standard care group (SC, N=92), whereas genetic data (VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP4F2) were also considered for the genotype-guided dosing (pharmacogenetic) group (PGx, N=87) by using an algorithm previously validated in 2,683 patients. The primary outcomes were: patients with steady dose, the time needed to reach the same and the percentage of therapeutic INRs. After 90 days, 25% of the SC and 39% of the PGx patients reached the steady dose (p=0.038). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that PGx group needed fewer days to reach therapeutic INR (p=0.033). Additionally, PGx had a higher percentage of therapeutic INRs than SC patients (50% and 45%, respectively) (p=0.046). After six months the proportion of steadily anticoagulated patients remained significantly higher in PGx (p=0.010). In conclusion, genotype-guided dosing was associated with a higher percentage of patients with steady dose than routine practice when starting oral anticoagulation with acenocoumarol.
到目前为止,有几项试验评估了旨在计算口服抗凝治疗剂量的算法的有效性,结果为阴性或相互矛盾。我们比较了基因型指导算法与医生管理在启动醋硝香豆素治疗方面的效果。在一项针对开始治疗的房颤患者的双臂、前瞻性、随机研究中,所有患者的首剂均根据医生的标准给药。72小时时,标准治疗组(SC,N = 92)根据国际标准化比值(INR)计算相应剂量,而基因型指导给药(药物遗传学)组(PGx,N = 87)则通过使用先前在2683例患者中验证过的算法,在计算剂量时还考虑了基因数据(维生素K环氧化物还原酶复合体1(VKORC1)、细胞色素P450 2C9(CYP2C9)和细胞色素P450 4F2(CYP4F2))。主要结局指标为:达到稳定剂量的患者、达到相同剂量所需时间以及治疗性INR的百分比。90天后,25%的SC组患者和39%的PGx组患者达到稳定剂量(p = 0.038)。卡普兰 - 迈耶分析显示,PGx组达到治疗性INR所需天数更少(p = 0.033)。此外,PGx组治疗性INR的百分比高于SC组患者(分别为50%和45%)(p = 0.046)。六个月后,PGx组中持续抗凝患者的比例仍显著更高(p = 0.010)。总之,在开始使用醋硝香豆素进行口服抗凝治疗时,与常规做法相比,基因型指导给药使达到稳定剂量的患者百分比更高。